Great fighters that lacked handspeed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Forza, Aug 28, 2015.


  1. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,724
    3,931
    Jun 13, 2012
    You can compensate for slow hands with great timing.

    Speed isn't the end all be all.

    Chavez Sr. had great timing. That's how he was able to beat Taylor (regardless of whether or not the stoppage was fair), and Camacho.

    It's also how Tszyu was able to stop Judah.
     
  2. glovesofcrimson

    glovesofcrimson Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    7
    Sep 14, 2013
    Cotto has very good timing, like everyone tries to tell Khan, speed kills but timing beats speed.
     
  3. Starched Him

    Starched Him Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,681
    61
    Feb 5, 2009
    he said great fighters
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,244
    9,785
    Jun 23, 2008
    In what universe are Froch and Maidana great fighters?

    And Golovkin doesn't have slow hands.
     
  5. glovesofcrimson

    glovesofcrimson Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    7
    Sep 14, 2013
    Froch is definitely a great fighter, can't argue with the results. Maidana is decent.
     
  6. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,244
    9,785
    Jun 23, 2008
    Handspeed is all relative. I think you guys are making the mistake of measuring against guys who had EXCEPTIONAL handspeed like Leonard, Jones, Robinson, Ali, Manny, Tyson, ect. Not too many guys in history like that.

    Chavez, for example, did not have slow hands. I think you need to watch more of a young Chavez if you think he was slow. He wasn't blazing fast, no, but he had deceptive quickness and awesome timing.

    The answer to this question comes down to Marciano and Foreman. Neither one of those guys had much handspeed, but made up for it with their booming power and great physical strength.
     
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,244
    9,785
    Jun 23, 2008
    Froch was not a great fighter. Let's not overrate him. Very good, yes. But a cut below being considered great.
     
  8. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,244
    9,785
    Jun 23, 2008
    Mel Taylor ponderous?

    This forum sinks deeper and deeper by the day.
     
  9. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,125
    10,639
    Jun 5, 2010
    are you joking or serious? :huh
     
  10. cryptic

    cryptic Active Member Full Member

    574
    1
    Dec 10, 2008
    you could be very good but i still don't see how you could be great. very good does not equate to great