You need to learn a little about the sport because you obviously do not have a clue. Try watching ballet or something OK
Right. Lol Now I know who is the least knowledgeable poster on this site. Thank you for pointING yourself out to me.
PAC already beat that azz, harder shots and better defense. PAC lost to the judges, not Floyd. Even daddy Floyd wasn't holding back when he let it all out on Floyd...you fighting like a BIOCHHHH right now, stop fighting scared like a coward.
ROFLMAO I have been in & around the sport of boxing both in & out of the ring for way over 30 yrs. That's longer than you've been on this earth probably lol I think I probably know a little bit about it. Which is more than I can say for you judging by your posts lol I suggest you take a little time to learn the game a bit before you open your mouth & insert your foot AGAIN!! That way you wont make yourself look so foolish Have a nice day :hi:
I actually fear for the sanity of these Pacquiao won conspiracy theorists, I am a neutral fan who didn't care who won, Mayweather won an absolute minimum of 8 rounds, I scored it 9-3 to Mayweather. Floyd nullified him, can you not just accept he won this fight, it doesn't mean you take away Pacquiao's whole career or signify that he would not win with a better strategy or learning a few things in preparation... for christ sake stop with the Pacquiao won, it's embarrassing CJ you refuse to even debate about the technicalities of a fight, how the hell can you profess to know more than the surface level of boxing, by surface level I mean good vs evil, aggressive vs defensive, you come across as not being able to grasp much more complex than that.
I seem to remember you saying in a post that you have only just recently started to watch boxing , Well that would explain your posts. To be absolutely blunt YDKSAB do you?? 1.. You are not neutral Youre a Mayweather lemming 2.. If you claim Mayweather won 9 rounds YDKSAB clearly 3.. If you claim Moretti's scorecard of 118-110 is legit see #2 4.. I do not think Pacquaio actually won but he came damn close considering his injury I scored it 115-113 to Floyd You are like the other guy, or is he another ALT ?? you know nothing about the sport Bye:hi:
In super duper slow mo Floyd is still hitting Pacquiaos gloves and shouldn`t be scored a landing punch. A case could be made for Floyd winning 115-113 but the 118-110 scorecard was a disgrace.
"A case could be made for Floyd winning 115-113", but a better case can be made for Pac winning. Even Freddie Roach had Pac beating Floyd, oh wait Freddie had Floyd winning .
I never said I watched boxing recently, I wasn't born in the golden era but I think I know a reasonable amount, I'm trying to learn more everyday but not from you obviously. I clearly seem to comprehend more than you since you can't accept any argument suggesting Mayweather actually wins three minute rounds. You are stuck on believing he merely 'runs' despite people continually supplying evidence and explanations for why he is not running and being given rounds for fleeing for his life, you know it's true you don't really understand much beyond what you want to understand. Again, I am a massive Pacquiao fan and have them level in resume. I gave Manny Marquez 1... I think Pac wins 4/10 against Floyd if they fought ten times, I didn't care who won, I know the Mayweather religious crew would be acting like you lot if he lost and blamed his hands.