Epic Pacquiao Hypocrisy

If the situation was flipped, the fans would be too. I'll hop into my "dimensional, time-space traveling" machine let you know what's going on.

 

Pacquiao had no problem when he was informed that De La Hoya had used an IV. What a hypocrit. Begging for more money he is, lol. His hurt shoulder excuse didn't get him the rematch, so he's hoping this will. You lost buddy, convincingly. Get over it.

 

Flo fans on damage control

 

no need for such extraordinary measures, you can just examine what actually happened. pac asks for a perfectly legal supplement, gets denied, floyd takes an illegal supplement, gets excused... now how much more clarity do you need to figure out what would happen should the roles be reversed.

 

You're still on that illegal supplement kick, huh? lol Some people will never get it.

 

50ml saline supplement= perfectly legal supplement (with approval)
750ml home saline supplement= banned supplement (as per contractual agreement)

 

The USADA the contracted drug testing agency told you there was nothing illegal also told you that he didn't have to file a TUE, but still did. The NSAC told you there was nothing illegal. The NSAC rules have no protocol (in essence if USADA had not submitted the TUE you would not have heard anything about this, because the NSAC doesn't require it) and the mixture was not a prohibited mixture. Thomas Hauser's article even told you, the mixes were not prohibited.

Yet still you're on WADA sight looking up ml's... :rofl

 

they can say all they want, its whats on paper that stands up in court... civil and public opinion.
they both agreed to use wada standards and floyd broke that agreement.
you shills can argue all you want, just like you spent months saying pac had no defamation case, then turned around to watch floyd pay off pacs taxes, its not going to change the facts

 

You haven't given any facts bro. The contract is WADA code USADA protocol, ISTUE TUE protocol. It's in the contract that you can look up and the overruling board rules of NSAC who does not have a protocol for this issue, and the USADA said no illegal actions. In other words the contract is covered for any of your so called 50ml, also he has not been suspected or investigated for any PED use, so Probably not gonna have any court case anyway.

Add that to the fact that it was reported that he had a 250ml and 500ml bag, with no proof that he injected. His lawyers would have a field day.

So again you go ahead and keep looking up ml's buddy. :good

 

wtf are you talkin about "keep looking up mls"? its only been mentioned 100 times in the last 6 hours here on this board... and you responded every single time.
look, i, like evryone else here, know that no matter what evidence is presented to you, you are not going to even consider changing your stance. you are not real, you are a caricature. everyone knows what youre going to say way before you say it. you are like background noise interrupting a serious conversation. time will will determine which one of us is living in reality.

 

why would I. The mls are irrelevant. Not obly per the contracted USADA protocol, but the NSAC rules. USADA's statement that there is no illegal action... How many times do you have to be told that before you quit looking up what ml's are prohibited per WADA protocol, lol.. Add to that the fact there is no proof of what amount he was administered. Thats bus ran over you and just kept on run over you and over you...

 

Floyd has to file for a TUE when getting any injection over 50 ml, which is clearly stated on the WADA prohibited list that you seem to know so much about. USADA is a WADA signatory, they must follow the prohibited list exactly as it is laid down, they cannot add or ignore any substances/methods on the list.

There is proof of how much he administered because he filed for an exemption for administering a banned method.

 

Floyd was cheating and probably roiding

 

There is proof of it?!? Where I didn't see that. Also, I was on the USADA website yesterday, and I don't remember seeing anything that said they were a WADA "signatory" but I do remember per the contract posted on Thomas Hauser's page that the contract was subject to ISTUE protocol which from WADA's homepage you can find the link that said that injections of 50ml or more is acceptable with a TUE, which USADA, has said that he did..... They being the agency who was contracted for their protocol also having advsd you that their was no illegal action. The NSAC not having any protocol which requires. still I have people telling me about WADA's ml rule. lol

 

Of course there is proof of how much he injected, you don't file for an exemption and not tell them what the exemption is for. Injections over 50 ml are banned and you can get an exemption for it, we all know that, the point is that it is a banned method. USADA can give out exemptions for steroids, epo, hgh, and everything else as well, doesn't mean the NSAC has to allow it. The NSAC has recently banned TRT exemptions, so are you saying that if USADA grants an exemption for TRT then it's okay because USADA said it? No it's not okay.


You keep talking about what USADA said then ignore what the NSAC says. They are on record clearly stating that they should have had final say in granting any and all exemptions for the fight, unless of course you believe the NSAC is lying and anything USADA says is the word that should be followed for boxing matches in Vegas.