Weak lol. They went paragraphy by paragraphy and tore Hauser a new *******. He's full of **** and was just trying to stir something up.
Of course USADA followed "their rules" their rules is what has gotten them into hot water with NSAC. USADA rules and agreements mean nothing as it's within NSAC's jurisdiction. USADA followed "their" protocol not the correct protocol, it's not the same thing. As NSAC have pointed out, USADA had no authority to issue a valid TUE within the state of Nevada only NSAC has that authority.
It was 25 pages of them proving the article was false - statement by statement. What more do you want? They proved him to be a hack journalist and a liar.
WRONG IVs are not prohibited by the NSAC and the use of IVs is, in fact, a common practice among athletes licensed to fight in Nevada. As such, it is illogical to suggest that Mr. Mayweather had an obligation to apply to NSAC for a TUE for a procedure that is not prohibited or otherwise monitored by them. As Mr. Bennett confirmed in an interview aired during the Mayweather v Berto pay-per-view telecast on September 12, 2015: 19 USADA CORRECTIONS This content is protected Mr. Mayweathers use of the IV was not prohibited under the NSAC rules at the time it was administered and would not be a violation of the NSAC rules today. Nonetheless, because Mr. Mayweather was voluntarily taking part in a USADA program, and therefore subject to the rules of the WADA Code, he took the additional step of applying for a TUE after the IV infusion was administered in order remain in compliance with the USADA program. Mr. Mayweather disclosed the infusion to USADA in advance of the IV being administered to him. Furthermore, once the TUE was granted, the NSAC and Mr. Pacquiao were immediately notified even though the practice is not prohibited under NSAC rules.
This article only serves to proves how more damning and corrupt USADA and mayweather... And still doesnt explain away why give TUE to someone who used IV a 750ml saline and vitamin solution.. An amount that is Obviously illegal according to WADA.. To administer at said persons home.. More illegal... 3 weeks after..
USADA went in depth I personally like them calling Hauser out AGAIN on the "positive sample a/b" from 2012 that a certain group of dumbasses on here keep bringing up.
These gents ain't trying to make sense, they are trying to win an argument by any means necessary. To put it bluntly, these gents will argue with a stop sign.
Are *****s denying that floyd took 750ml... 700ml over the 50ml limit WADA stated, and that USADA and NSAC are suppose to abide by WADA guidelines.. So how is granting TUE for that will make it less illegal? And why a urine test for stuff that is injected into blood? Which can be diluted by other stuff that goes into blood via IV? Doesnt make sense
but you dont even bother to challenge any points he makes, like an adult would. you just cover your ears and call him a "hater", like a child would. not only that, you dont have the courage to even admit that the circumstances paint floyd in a negative light, youre just content to stick your head in the sand and call anyone who doesnt stick their head in the sand also, a hater.