Broner just has to keep

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BlizzyBlizz, Oct 4, 2015.


  1. kragz

    kragz 49*-0 Full Member

    3,910
    2
    Dec 6, 2010
    Broner can only let his hands go when his opponent lets him. He sure was gunshy in the Maidana fight.
     
  2. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    He also learned a lot in that fight.
     
  3. kragz

    kragz 49*-0 Full Member

    3,910
    2
    Dec 6, 2010
    Was that before or after the Porter fight? :think
     
  4. smooveonthe88

    smooveonthe88 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    11
    May 26, 2008
    Matthyse quit bro...his eye...he...yanno...quit.
     
  5. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Did he fight Maidana after the Porter fight? Dumbass:silly
     
  6. kragz

    kragz 49*-0 Full Member

    3,910
    2
    Dec 6, 2010
    You missed the entire point of my very simple post. How embarrassing :rofl:lol:
     
  7. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    Iman, Bogere, Lundy, Provodnikov, Benevides...It's a strong division.
     
  8. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    I disagree. I think he's capable of leading. He had so many opportunities against Porter and wouldn't let them go even when Porter wasn't doing anything. The kid fights like he's 35 at times when he has the hand speed and pop to get respect early.

    I can't stand watching his corner communicate with him in between rounds. Never really gets told to step the F up and let the hands go or anything.
     
  9. madpuppy

    madpuppy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,165
    6
    May 15, 2011
    Exactly. Broner is a good fighter with a pretty good career, just didn't live up to the early hype. And even through he acts like a total fool, he takes on tough fights, which is refreshing in an era of ducking and safe fights.
     
  10. Godhead

    Godhead Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,649
    21
    Jan 26, 2010
    When Broner fights somebody who can hit, he folds and becomes inactive, thats why he lost to Porter.
     
  11. FilipMNE

    FilipMNE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,394
    11
    Jul 3, 2011
    Broner is Broner, he is B- level and he will always beat guys lower level, but when he faces B or B+ he simply doesnt have that something to win, he has no footwork no work rate and very overrated defense and ring IQ.
    Crawford beat him 100%.
    I would havily favor Garcia and Postol is 60/40, Lucas stops him dont get crazy because he lost he still destroys Broner.
     
  12. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    Broner needs to up his offense and stop waiting on the other guy. He tries to plat the counter puncher to much.
     
  13. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    No I didn't. Your sarcasm just didn't fly over.
     
  14. kragz

    kragz 49*-0 Full Member

    3,910
    2
    Dec 6, 2010
    There was no sarcasm.
     
  15. JHDallas

    JHDallas Active Member Full Member

    681
    69
    Jun 19, 2013
    Trying to address the comments I've seen. IMO:

    Crawford- Beats Postol in a FOY type of match decides not to fight Garcia

    Postol- Handily beats Garcia landing 200 more punches and cutting him to shreds, then loses decision

    Garcia- Beats but does not KO Broner on clear UD, avoids Postol re-match

    Broner- Lets hands go and beats Matthysse straight up

    Matthysse- Quits after loss to Broner

    Spence- 2 years down the road stops Garcia and knows not to fight Crawford