Hauser strikes back again!

it's simple really

Pac in Wild Card Gym = PED'ed to the gills

Floyd IV'ing at home = cleaning up the sport of boxing

where's Dr. Paulie Malinaggi when you need him :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

The problem is more with the commissions than the fighters, IMO. I agree fighters should not be financing their own testing agencies. But, commissions should do more to ensure the safety of the fighters.

 

Of course! This is the crux of the issue............

 

Yes he used them as a deterrent while he himself received carte blanche treatment with TUE's and privacy notices. It all started back in 2010 against Shane Mosley. What a perfect fighter to launch your drug crusade with. A known cheater. Was sickens me is he all this infrastructure in place but he still found the need to drain Canelo down to 151 and forced some bogus gloves on Maidana.

 

well, where were you when joyboys accused pac of doping when not a single ounce of evidence was present?

oh, the hypocrisy!

and the evidences are circumstantial. i saw you and your boylet nekkid in a room, dont you think anybody would have thought different?

 

anybody already twittered Paulie about this whole IV thing? i wonder what his response would be.

 

Clearly you are deflecting and your lady boy tendencies are evident. Let the men talk and go get your toes done...girlfriend.

 

deflect what?

TL;DR

Hauser saw documents Fluid pumped about a liter of saline into his blood, without prior approval.

papers dont lie. Fluid is the Mask Man!

 

Tell me what that proves Columbo. What was he masking?

 

i am appalled at your attempt to feign ignorance.

 

I am appalled at your attempt to feign knowledge.

 

only an id10t would fight to downplay Hauser's contentions when the damning circumstances are all too clear. that's you.

 

Who's fighting them dummy? "Contentions" and "circumstances" are not hard EVIDENCE. That's why you choose words like "contentions" and "circumstances"; because, you have no proof. You express a lot of passion and belief in something that is based purely on speculation, your personal bias, "contentions" and "circumstances."

I could have "contentions" and "circumstances", which point to you being a lover of hairy men. But, if I don't have any evidence of that, can I declare it as truth?

 

but these evidences against me, you dont have them. nor are there circumstances to back your BS.

too bad for you Hauser obtained documents to support his claim. see the difference?

you are one dense mf. :rofl

 

It's quality investigative journalism. Primitive simple-minded h0m0-sapien.
I BET you didn't read the complete article for you'd know that he said: ''I don’t know whether or not Floyd Mayweather used prohibited performance enhancing drugs.''. Followed by: ''I do know that the facts surrounding Mayweather’s May 1 IV have not been fully explored.''

Now you can return to the chicken frying station.