You can't convince me Louis beats Tyson

He certainly is.

 

The General Forum has got to quit leaving their gate unlocked.

 

termite, I'll be glad when you no longer amuse McGrain.

 

You are not a very good liar jab,this is evident with your obnoxious postings,and actually reading those posts on the other site its not hard to see why you were booted...the funny thing is you are on vitali 24/7 here even accusations of paying refs and nonsense as such....gotta wonder what the dumb meter is on here because you are about at the bottom...:-(

 

Still waiting on how Billy Conn beats razor Ruddock and company of the 90's top Hw's?

 

It's looks like I'm going to have to come in here and chase Uncle Clemmy out of another thread.

 

The only thing you could possibly chase here is Jab back up to second worst poster on this thread from number one as you take his place . Don't worry that doesn't change the FACT you are biggest dummy on the site in general....



Did you just jump in here to make a complete fool of yourself or do you have actual opinion of the thread which will make a fool of you anyway which is why I want to hear it? :deal

 

Quite frankly Clemmy I'm bored with schooling you it's becoming too easy.
You're simply the gift that keeps on giving.

 

Smart move! :nod

Now go pollute more threads with off topic personal attack B.S .... if you decide to change your mind and give us a breakdown here ,I could use a good laugh! :good

 

Past prime or not Tyson lost to a C grade fighter in Williams and a D grade fighter in McBride. And lets be frank Douglas was only a B grader also. Yet the mighty Mike Tyson got stopped by all 3 without mentioning the two elite guys who beat his brains in.

Joe Louis would've have KO'd Kevin McBride at any point of his career, including the version that Marciano destroyed. McBride was absolute garbage yet Tyson could neither drop him or beat him and then quit in pathetic fashion.

Louis lost to Schmeling, Charles and Marciano. Absolute A grade fighters all and Louis fought at a higher level for longer than Tyson did. He only ever lost to the best and he was well past his prime for two of those.

In 26 title defences you're going to have off nights but on Louis's off nights (Conn, Galento, Godoy) Louis still won whereas Mike on his first off night got ktfo by a 42-1 underdog. Big difference there and making nonsense statements about the Tyson who couldn't beat McBride beating Louis is just laughable and explains why you have credibility issues on here.

 

Ruddock was 180 for his first pro fight, is he a cruiserweight? Louis' peak as a puncher was 210 pounds when he knocked out SHW Buddy Baer in one round. That is about 5 pounds lesser than Tyson at his peak. In contrast it took Tyson 10 rounds to get rid of punching bag Ribalta and he couldn't knock out Quick Tillis, and both men were smaller than Louis and nowhere near his quality.

He specifically took up a training camp and didn't drink for the Louis fight. But let's ignore that. What's wrong with being floored by Galento? It's not like Louis was genuinely hurt or something. He was hit by a 230 lb guy with tiny gloves and went down. Boo-hoo. Who won?

 

"Holmes vs Spinks was a robbery, I had Holmes winning 8-3 with one round even!"

"But it was a 15 round fight you imbecilic moron!"

"Err....... Err....... Yeah but 3 rounds I didn't score because they were.... Err... Too even."

rofl:roflrofl:rofl

 

Another thread ruined by trolls.

I think I'm gonna find a new boxing forum.

 

I agree. It's getting really tiresome.

 

Bullsh*t. You can't even comprehend your own writing, but don't worry, you are not alone in that. And to quote you..."what about 190 Louis getting plastered twice by Gallento (sp)"... Louis weighed 200 3/4 for that fight.