Is It Possible Bob Foster Is Overrated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, Oct 29, 2015.


  1. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,196
    948
    Sep 10, 2005
    In those scenarios where a champion's opposition is generally believed to be on par at best then it's up to the champion to demonstrate exactly who's boss.

    Foster certainly scores highly by that measure.
     
  2. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,518
    10,694
    Aug 22, 2004
    In other words, cover the spread........yeah, that's a good point too.
     
  3. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    Foster was brutal as a LT heavy. A real seek and destroy killer in there despite his lanky appearance. Rapier like jab, KO power in either fist especially that hook.....quick and aggressive.
     
  4. boxfan22

    boxfan22 Active Member Full Member

    516
    3
    Feb 10, 2015
    Ali once lost an amateur match by KO. Amateur and professional are totally different. No, bob foster is the only guy.
     
  5. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,035
    6,243
    Jan 22, 2009
    With his height, power and skills, Bob is a stylistic nightmare for anyone at 175. Even though he doesn't have the greatest resume at that weight, he has to be top 10 maybe top 5 at lightheavy.
     
  6. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,868
    Apr 30, 2006
    Brutal matchup at 175 for most, although I still feel his freakish size and power at the weight were bigger factors than his skill was.
     
  7. Rex Tickard

    Rex Tickard Active Member Full Member

    818
    14
    Dec 29, 2012
    I've always felt that he basically "guards the doorway" to that heap - meaning that he just missed out on making it himself, but rates over anyone else who isn't in it. If he'd had a bit more depth of resume at 175 and/or more success at HW, then he'd have crossed the threshold IMO.

    My all-time LHW list would probably look something along the likes of,
    1. Charles
    2. Tunney
    3. Moore
    4. Spinks
    5. Langford
    6. Foster
     
  8. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,246
    Feb 6, 2009
    My top 3 are
    Charles
    Spinks
    Foster
    Then I have Moore and Roy Jones
    Those 5 stand out for me
     
  9. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,796
    6,500
    Dec 10, 2014
    no

    in his prime he cleaned out the light heavyweight division and was champ. for almost six years. Sure, he got killed by various heavyweights, but if you look at just his work at 175 he was extremely good.
     
  10. BundiniBlack

    BundiniBlack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,555
    412
    May 20, 2015
    I think Hopkins would kill Foster. Bernard would man handle him on the inside like he did to all tall fighters
     
  11. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,035
    6,243
    Jan 22, 2009
    :goodNice list. Cheers. I would throw Ruby Robert Fitsimmons and Harry Greb in there as well.
     
  12. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,035
    6,243
    Jan 22, 2009
    Chad Dawson? Jermaine Taylor?
     
  13. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,035
    6,243
    Jan 22, 2009
    Bob simply didn't have the physique to deal with the heavies. He looked like a string bean in there against Muhammed.
     
  14. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,201
    2,357
    Mar 26, 2005
    Saw him live in 1969 destroy Andy Kendall...Foster was a great Lt Heavy champ..
     
  15. BundiniBlack

    BundiniBlack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,555
    412
    May 20, 2015
    Hopkins is taller than Jermaine Taylor

    I am talking about Tarver Pavlik and Eastmen