The reason why i'm not going to bet on Fury-Wlad fight

Bet on Fury losing then.

 

The vast majority agrees with that... they bet on Wlad
http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=553129

 

As suggested already, surely you should bet on Wlad.
You have the ideal situation. You want Fury to win, but you suspect Wlad will.
So if you lose your money on Wlad you'll still be happy because that means Fury won.

 

Wlad by KO is at even odds :good

 

Betting is about taking risks, and the house usually wins... that's why the most common options don't give you much winnings, because they're likely to happen.
Fury winning by KO gives you up to 7 times your bet (wich isn't even a good deal to be honest) because it's not very likely. Fury getting the decision 12 to 1 even.

 

stop complaining and just drop a ton of dough on Vladdy,,,,

if Fury wins at least you will have gained even more respect for Fury :good

 

Okay, so then why not bet on the probable winner? :huh

 

I would bet on fury on points if it were not in robbery city.

Staying way clear away from this one.

 

This fight is one of the easiest to bet on..... either Vlad stoppage at evens or cover with Vlad UD at 3/1. I also went Vlad technical KO at 3/1.

 

I never bet on fights....I'm not going to put money on an event over which I have no control. Especially on a bi-polar whacko like Fury...he's liable to pull a Oliver "Atomic Bull" McCall complete breakdown once he sees how out of his league his is in after a few Wlad jabs.

But just for fun....and if one boxer was 50-1 or 100-1 or something in that order, I might drop $10 just for chuckles.

 

Dwyer says bet on Fury, but remember, the opinion you follow should be your own. Just consider this to be a second opinion from a complete stranger online.

 

That will apply to any events for you. The only one you will have some form of control will be ones which u participate in.