Juan Manuel Marquez

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Beouche, Dec 24, 2015.


  1. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,048
    Oct 13, 2010
    If only JMM had decided to take the Manny/Floyd route and drugged himself up from the get go

    Juan ducked nobody. He fought both of the steroid cheats under heavy concessions, but had the cohones to fight them anyway

    Lightweight division was utterly stacked - Juan Diaz, Casamayor, Katsidas ..... Manny very quickly skipped that division, while Juan - moving up - took them on and took each one out


    What makes all the above all the more astonishing is that at one stage JMM was an unbeatable counterpuncher. NO ONE could beat him when he fought like that

    But he couldnt land the big fights. And so he changed his style, became an aggressive boxer puncher. That means for the vast majority of Juan's career, he was fighting in a way that wasnt his natural

    He's the best ive ever seen
     
  2. Tigre Relampago

    Tigre Relampago Active Member Full Member

    530
    1
    Jun 16, 2013
    i'm the biggest JMM fan, but i do believe he was onto something by the time he fought PAC 4. But Manny has been on the juice heavily since 2009, and Floyd probably all of his career to be able to backpedal that fast.
     
  3. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,048
    Oct 13, 2010

    Yeah. Juan levelled the playing field come fight 4
     
  4. scarecrow

    scarecrow Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,880
    125
    Dec 13, 2015
    Ducked Hamed. Ducked Morales. Waited until Barrera was shot and then still almost lost. Couldn't defeat prime Pacquiao.

    Defeated by Freddie Norwood.
     
  5. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,790
    14,479
    Dec 2, 2012
    100% OFF THE MARK on just about every point. :deal
     
  6. BEATDOWNZ

    BEATDOWNZ Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,382
    1,045
    Nov 30, 2014
    Levelled it? You must be on drugs yourself if you think he only "levelled it". He took it to an unseen level!

    It's a shame that he will retire on that victory knowing he had to cheat to win.
     
  7. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,790
    14,479
    Dec 2, 2012
  8. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,048
    Oct 13, 2010

    Just imagine what Juan woud have done to the roided cheat if he had levelled the playing field earlier

    He would be widely acclaimed as the Greatest of our era

    He ducked NO ONE
    He drained NO ONE

    JMM = God
     
  9. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
  10. aaalbert

    aaalbert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,041
    2,028
    Jan 15, 2015
    Preach on! It's him that got me so interested in boxing!
     
  11. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,048
    Oct 13, 2010

    you have impeccable taste

    :cheers:
     
  12. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    fought c j for 30k instead of pac rematch for 750k.

    fought jaca and jandaeng instead of soto and guzman.

    fought likar ramos instead of d. diaz.

    fought serhy fedchenko instead of judah or rios.

    fought alvarado instead of provodnikov....except for them floydhos and all you pee pee drinkers, you ain't fooling anybody here.
     
  13. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,048
    Oct 13, 2010
    oh puhlease. let me worship my boy for once without your hate. merry christmas champ
     
  14. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,048
    Oct 13, 2010
    [YT]iuetmgTpfzc[/YT]
     
  15. Bollywooden

    Bollywooden Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,233
    642
    Jun 8, 2014
    :lol:

    It's funny though, there is evidence for Mayweather & Marquez (IV & Heredia) but none for Pacquiao other than his brilliance in the ring yet you speak on him like he's the same.