You're still delusional, you picked Fury solely on his nationality. You probably picked Haye to beat Wlad as well. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
So what was the basis of you picking Wlad ? Either you assumed he would simply turn up and win, or you know absolutely jack**** about the game ? Now let me guess which one of the two it is ?????? I'm going for both.
Wlad was in his prime v Haye and was frightened to attack him and resorted to leaning on him and hugging him. Wlad could fight Fury every 3 months and Fury would beat him every time and the reason? Fury has far better boxing fundamentals than Wlad which makes him a better boxer.Some people fail to realise that Heavyweight boxing is not decided by who has the more ripped body.Wlad is very one dimensional and doesn`t have the ability to adjust or change his game plan against a guy who is bigger and better than him. Fury could easily see Wlad winding up a big shot and just poked him with a jab and knocked him off balance very simple stuff that will be repeated time and time again.
Based on all of the information we had at the time Klitschko was the man to go with for most knowledgeable fans. Most people picking Fury simply picked him because of his nationality, or because they didn't like Klitschko. Now for once they happened to be right, that doesn't mean they know **** about the game... A lot of these people were the same people who have picked against Klitschko several times and were of course wrong on all of those occasions, and many picked Haye to win as well for reasons of nationality like they did with Fury. A true boxing fan doesn't pick the outcome of fights based on hate or nationalism, you can cheer the other guy on for those reasons sure, but PICKING the outcome is entirely different. That's what I see here.... A bunch of clowns who did just that and happened to be right for once.
There were many who picked Fury based on ability, and plenty posted predictions and outlined exactly how he would beat Wlad. There were thousands more who rubbished Fury chances, most were based on Wlads dominance, and even more laughable, Wlads superior athleticism
You're the worst poster on the forum. The asked you a very simple question. Why you felt Wlad would win and that's what you come back with. You couldn't answer because you are a casual fanboi who doesn't know the first thing about this sport
And..... Here's the man who's a perfect example of what I describe in my post, the guy who's made a complete mockery of himself on here over the years. atsch
I think fury just took wlads jab away from him and didnt know what to do at that time. I think the rematch is 50/50 if a "shot fighter" can win 4-5 rounds vs the heavyweight champion then furys reign wont last long.
Fury is chinny and if Wlad actually throws some punches he could well stop him, not sure he will though
Ah, I see, you aren't making any sense,check the tapes, I broke down well before fight night how I thought Fury would be most likely to win and SO IT PROVED. You know, like, in REALITY. Why the funk should I listen to you now????? I've been right already...GTFOH
So let me guess, all Wlad has to do is hit Furys apparently weak chin ? Just like he did in the first fight, oops. I've news for you, he couldn't do it in the first fight, and what proof is there that Fury is " Chinny " ?
I picked Wlad in the first fight, I'd probably pick him again in the rematch. I think we'll adjust as he needs to. I've no problem admitting when I'm wrong though
I've always tought Golovkin is like a miniwlad, in the looks, voice, behaviour, phisically assets and partially style. I also think he should hire Golovkin and Sanchez as his trainers, lol. Probably the style that would be easier for him to pick up. But he won't, he won't change anything, just be more aggressive and gets his face torn to pieces.