Wilder or brook - who is the biggest fraud

Khan isn't relevant to this. These two are being compared because they're unbeaten in 30-odd fights with relatively padded records

 

Wilder is no fraud for sure! he beat Stiverne who was rated in the top 3 by most ESB members. ( with a broken hand ) he didn,t lose a round.

:bbb

 

No one sensible considered him a top 3 contender. I did think he'd beat Wilder but he was never considered that good in my books

 

I could outbox Stiverne. He's a slow as **** oaf.

No they haven't.

Gavin at least has the amateur credentials that the French Pastry chef and glass-jawed Molina don't and hadn't yet been KO'd.

Ion was I believe a mando? Even if I'm wrong with that, he's still a better opponent than Molina who let's face it... is an utter glass-jawed bum. Ion at least was coming off a decent run and again, hadn't been stopped.

 

Golovkin is the biggest fraud in boxing today.

 

You couldn't out box anybody

Vlad's chin...now that is glass.

 

noob speaking

 

You don't even know who I am, son.

Undefeated in street fights, son (7-0 record, boy) and I won a Nottinghamshire Boy Scout Under 18s Boxing Tournament in my youth.

 

Brook's been a pro for 11 years, I think Wilder's resume is better lol, especially if he beats Szpilka.

 

No..no you couldn't.

 

Wow.... Not!

 

Yet Stiverne wasn't rushing in with his ****ing head. Anybody could have outboxed Stiverne he's about as fast as a sloth.

 

Undefeated in street fights:rofl


WTF

A grown ass man still getting in street fights.The fact that you'd lie about still getting in street fights speaks volumes.

 

Let me guess you, ellerbe and MVC.

 

You better be careful....he'll track you down and bite you on the crotch.:deal