Kahn looking All over except where he should and thats vs Kell Brook

I think he might be Garcia and Brookes mandatory, is that right or am I confusing myself.

I thought he was brooks mandatory but then he now says he's DSGs mandatory, wtf is going on with s three bs titles. Should be one 1 per division, phuck the rest.

WBC and that's good enough

 

Agreed, he's looking for everyone BUT Brook, the guy that's been calling him out for years.

 

Fact is Brook is irrelevant outside of UK, he is good fighter but he faced just one real fighter in 12 years so he is to blame for putting himself in position to beg Khan for a fight lol

 

Would be a big fight in the north of England. Not so sure about anywhere else.

 

I hope this does not become a Witter Hatton situation where they dont fight but the difference between that is atleast Hatton had an actual fight with Mayweather and Pacquiao with Khan nothing is close to getting signed and Witter has an IBF belt plus it a huge money fight in the UK there is really no excuse at this point

 

Khan gave brook a generous 20/: offer if he wants a shot at the big time he should take it

 

Brook and Hearn just stated 60/40 in Khan's favor... that is highly generous considering Brook is the CHAMP. But as it's been said, Khan isn't looking to face the best. He's just looking for a pay-day.

 

Khan is a *****, let's face it he hand picks opponents with no power. Am not a huge fan of brook either, but Khan has now been publicly outed with the 60/40 offer, Wembley stadium, 80,000, world title, ppv. Why would you not want the fight?? Oh yes because he knows he would get beat.

 

If I was Khan I wouldn't have faced him. Because the winner of Brook-Khan probably wouldn't have been granted a payday with Mayweather anyways. Considering that Mayweather hadn't fought his mandatory (Thurman) for 3 years. I doubt he would have fought the winner of Khan-Brook.

And if you lose then forget it about happening.

 

Khan is probably gonna take on someone past his best days, like a Guerrero or Berto, but it's going to be a cherrypick gone wrong.

 

Not financially. For what money Khan brings to the fight, I don't think Brook even deserves 40%. Sure, Brook is the champ, he is undefeated, looks a potential star, and is easy to watch, but.. Brook isn't that big of a name - certainly not in the same league as Khan. Khan brings the money to that fight, and he obviously knows it. If I was Khan, I would offer 70/30 in his favor, and tell Brook to go **** himself.

 

Perfect ****ysis.

 

An the fact that his win over porter is better than any win Khan has is more of the point.

 

So Khan would sell 80,000 at Wembley without brook?? Don't think so, 60/40 in his favour makes double what he gets for fighting Garcia, no brainer.