Rate Kell's resume out of 10.

70%of it was guided by f w a nk kell was put on back burn whilst khazn was marketed protected and carefully guided
The facts then khan left f w a nk for the American dream \ dollar
Things then started coming apart and boom match room boxing comes back from the wilderness and a certain someone becomes shook

It's called clever marketing and other things are sacrificed
Kell will obliterate khan then khan is rebuilding once again switching this blaming that rinse repeat the gulibale lap it up ha ha

 

3/10 literally. A single meaningful win

And I rate him big time

 

Anyway why are people going on about resumes, porters pre brook was better but he lost, is this the last thing the Khan fanboys can hold onto when kell pushes his poo back in?

 

Its a 6 , however he is an 8.

I think Hearn just does what all British promoters do. Get the belt , fight mandatories and over price the fight.

The only boxers who have made real money in the last 20 years have been Lennox, Naz and Hatton. And by this I mean sporting money.

 

Froch?? Can even put fury in there, best British win in the last decade or so

 

6.

 

I'd want none of them on it unless they were a mandatory

 

3.7

 

If you are going to play the 'it's great to have a shot ex champ' card then you have to put senchenko down as a good win ffs, besides two of those on Kells list are MANDATORIES, something your precious little flower amir hasn't had to worry about for years and probably never will again

 

Brook is gonna get found out pretty soon. Not impressed at all with his career apart from porter (which I had porter winning) I think Khan will win this one later this year. 4 for me

 

Paulie for as limited as he is proved he's a class above senchenko