Just look at post #120 and you'll see how idiotic he is. He has less brain cells than a functioning re****.
You have already admitted indirectly and unintentionally that Tyson had a more manly chin than the girl.
yes those 2 fights took the sting out off razor ruddock ,donovan wasnt great but he had a good chin and had remarkable recovering powers when hurt , yes lennox lewis fought a shot fighter
Ruddock of 91 probably would have beaten the 96 version of Tyson which is an interesting thought, couldnt see Mike taking that kind of punishment when he was wore down by Holyfield who didnt hit so hard. Its interesting because it shows the decline of Tyson post prison which some dispute.
Ruddock's skills must have been is a seriously diminished state too. Compare the way Ruddock fought Tyson in 1991 against how he boxed Weaver in 1986. Ruddock went into skills decline as soon as he got a high rating. Fell in love with his own power.
It was a very good set of wins over a guy in his prime, who at the time was seen as the dangerman of the division. Also, Tyson had been accused of ducking Ruddock for two years. So it answered some questions. If Tyson hadn't fought Ruddock and opted for Foreman instead, the same people would be sitting here talking about how Tyson chose an old man over a young prime hungry fighter.
They showed he was not what he was in his absolute prime, but that he had enough left to contend for the title again. It's a big shame Tyson/Holyfield didn't happen in late '91.
It wasn't diminished skills It was a change in style. He started fighting like a stalking slugger after the Weaver fight. I guess he believed he could stop anyone with that left hook/uppercut He would have been well served to box more against Tyson.
Neglected skills, diminished skills. It all amounts to the same thing. I agree, he should have boxed more against Tyson. Jabbed. And tried throwing a right uppercut occasionally, instead of just the same old predictable left.