Significance of Ruddock fights for Tyson?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by rski, Feb 21, 2016.


  1. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,525
    21,612
    Jul 30, 2014
    Just look at post #120 and you'll see how idiotic he is. He has less brain cells than a functioning re****. :lol:
     
  2. daverobin

    daverobin Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,403
    515
    Oct 30, 2015
    got it so u and foremandempsey are the same person got it ....see ya
     
  3. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,525
    21,612
    Jul 30, 2014
    That would explain why we're on at the same time right? :lol:
     
  4. UFC2015

    UFC2015 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,083
    380
    Sep 12, 2015
    You have already admitted indirectly and unintentionally that Tyson had a more manly chin than the girl.
     
  5. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,525
    21,612
    Jul 30, 2014
    When did I ever make such a statement?
     
  6. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,525
    21,612
    Jul 30, 2014
    Jamal Perkins, I'd appreciate a response to post #34.
     
  7. kinganut

    kinganut New Member Full Member

    12
    1
    Feb 24, 2016
    yes those 2 fights took the sting out off razor ruddock ,donovan wasnt great but he had a good chin and had remarkable recovering powers when hurt , yes lennox lewis fought a shot fighter
     
  8. rski

    rski Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,572
    1,802
    May 12, 2013
    Ruddock of 91 probably would have beaten the 96 version of Tyson which is an interesting thought, couldnt see Mike taking that kind of punishment when he was wore down by Holyfield who didnt hit so hard. Its interesting because it shows the decline of Tyson post prison which some dispute.
     
  9. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,525
    21,612
    Jul 30, 2014
    Nobody calls me a troll, except you. Coming from the likes of you, I take that as a compliment.
     
  10. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    977
    Nov 7, 2011
    Good post
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Ruddock's skills must have been is a seriously diminished state too.

    Compare the way Ruddock fought Tyson in 1991 against how he boxed Weaver in 1986.

    Ruddock went into skills decline as soon as he got a high rating. Fell in love with his own power.
     
  12. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    473
    Mar 13, 2010
    It was a very good set of wins over a guy in his prime, who at the time was seen as the dangerman of the division.

    Also, Tyson had been accused of ducking Ruddock for two years. So it answered some questions.

    If Tyson hadn't fought Ruddock and opted for Foreman instead, the same people would be sitting here talking about how Tyson chose an old man over a young prime hungry fighter.
     
  13. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    They showed he was not what he was in his absolute prime, but that he had enough left to contend for the title again.

    It's a big shame Tyson/Holyfield didn't happen in late '91.
     
  14. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    It wasn't diminished skills

    It was a change in style.

    He started fighting like a stalking slugger after the Weaver fight. I guess he believed he could stop anyone with that left hook/uppercut

    He would have been well served to box more against Tyson.
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Neglected skills, diminished skills.
    It all amounts to the same thing.

    I agree, he should have boxed more against Tyson. Jabbed. And tried throwing a right uppercut occasionally, instead of just the same old predictable left.