Érik Morales vs. Juan Manuel Márquez

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Feb 24, 2016.


  1. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,415
    28,983
    Feb 25, 2015
    The more I think about it the more confident I become about Morales' chances in the first two epoch's.

    I just don't like this matchup stylistically for Marquez. I don't like him in a matchup against a taller, longer, stronger, tougher, precise fighter like Morales. How is he going to get past that jab and that overhand right? Marquez is going to have to score points, but what will he do to get past the jab? Will he sell out and try and initiate some offense to score? I just don't see how he will score enough.

    I'm really thinking wide Morales decision here.
     
  2. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,491
    Jan 22, 2009
    Nice:good
     
  3. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,491
    Jan 22, 2009
    E1 EM. Workrate and closer to peak.
    E2 JMM. EM was in pain after Pac.
    E3 JMM. EM was pretty much done.
     
  4. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,491
    Jan 22, 2009
    Could not agree more:good:good:good
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Marquez always wins and was always a level above Morales because of his ring intelligence. Marquez was prime at 126 and past prime after if you actually watch him there you'll see. His resume at feather is massively underrated

    Morales got overrated due to being a fun fighter. The fact is Arum protected him up until the first Barrera fight, which was a gift decision. He also took the path of least resistance at featherweight prior to the Barrera rematch, which he has a case for winning. He also could of fought Casamayor and Corrales at 130 but didn't. Arum kept Morales well away from Marquez despite promoting both at the time.

    Stylistically Morales always struggled against counter punchers and movers. Look at Raheem and the first Espadas fight.

    Mainly because Morales had no defense and doesn't stay behind his jab at range. Watch Morales-Raheem, Morales-Espadas 1 and Morales Chi and come back with the argument that one of the most accurate counter punchers in history would have trouble landing on Morales. Raheem was shorter than JMM
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,109
    82,908
    Nov 30, 2006
    Updated standings:

    This content is protected
    33-11-1 Morales
    This content is protected
    21-15-7 Márquez
    This content is protected
    39-3-0 Márquez

    71-51-8 edge to Márquez overall.
     
  7. thanosone

    thanosone Love Your Brother Man Full Member

    6,495
    2,435
    Sep 23, 2007
    You forgot that Morales is God.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,109
    82,908
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yes but Márquez is the patron saint of urophages, which cancels out Morales' divinity. :think
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,109
    82,908
    Nov 30, 2006
    Agree that Márquez's work at feather doesn't get enough credit. He was avoided but made the most of it and turned in some beautiful efforts to dominate some not great but still very good opponents.

    Disagree to an extent on Morales being overrated. He deserves inclusion with the rest of the Fab-4 without question IMO, even if they all excelled in more individual standout aspects of the game than he did. Érik was just very well-rounded and fiercely determined to make up for what he lacked in "special abilities" that his peers had.

    As for both having been under Arum, not sure that is true. Before he landed with Golden Boy, my recollection is that Juan and his brother Rafa had spent years as free agents. They worked a lot with Zanfer, who do have a loose but very positive and longstanding working relationship with Top Rank, so maybe therein stems your confusion?

    Morales vs. Chico or Casa would have been nearly as much of a treat as versus Márquez.

    Good point about the Raheem incident not happening in a vacuum, as it was foreshadowed with Guty. Neither is half the boxer Márquez is.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,109
    82,908
    Nov 30, 2006
    I'm kind of surprised, actually, that more people aren't taking a leap of faith on Comeback Morales (or the draw - the only remaining option from the nine given with not even a single vote!!) in Epoch 3. :think

    When he was giving Maidana hell and whooping Cano people were tipping him in hypothetical match-ups with some top 15 welters and even higher ranked light welters.

    I wonder if people are realizing where the cut-off for E3 is, and that we are talking about Limond/Maidana/Cano/Garcia I Morales vs. Katsidis/Ramos/Pac III/Fedchenko Márquez, and not Pac IV/Bradley/Alvarado Márquez.
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,109
    82,908
    Nov 30, 2006
    Actually that raises a bit of a brain teaser...

    Which version of Márquez was better - Epoch 3, or post-E3? :huh

    Certainly his boxing was tidier in the Katsidis/Ramos/Pac III/Fedchenko days. His reflexes looked pretty shot in Pac IV, and Timbo had moments where he downright embarrassed him...but as counterweight against that, Márquez did settle into welter and develop considerably enhanced strength (cue the PED accusations :roll:) and his punches were clearly more potent after E3 than during.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,109
    82,908
    Nov 30, 2006
    Also, because of that decline in reflexes and gain in power, his style changed a bit to become more of a stalker-puncher than a fencer & countering specialist. Nacho also had more free time devoted to him as Rafa was no longer in the picture and Nacho had whittled down his camp and become more selective, and was able to concentrate fully on helping fine-tune Márquez's transition into a KO hunter.
     
  13. LordSouness

    LordSouness Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,195
    691
    Feb 15, 2014
    2007-2012 Marquez is probably second, third or fourth P4P in the world behind May/Pac and intermittently some others (like Ward, Martinez etc). So easy enough sell to say that he's better during that period that after.

    It stands as testament to Marquez' incredible boxing brain that he was able to adapt his style even further as he aged and declined in some areas. That's what set him apart from the Pac, Morales and MAB imo. The ATG lists will probably never accurately record him.
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,109
    82,908
    Nov 30, 2006
    Well, to be fair, people forget that Barrera had ano entire career and retired - long BEFORE reinventing himself with a virtual 180° turn in style - culminating with his defeat of Jiménez.

    Barrera evolved more than any of his peers, gradually but DRAMATICALLY, over 23 years.
     
  15. LordSouness

    LordSouness Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,195
    691
    Feb 15, 2014
    I'd say it was different with Barrera though, it seemed to me more like a progression with him. He was fundamentally the same fighter, he just had many more facets to his game after he truly put his time into the sport. This, to me, is evidenced by him having a well-defined peak in ability and then slowly declining after.

    Whereas with Marquez, he added and removed pieces to his game to suit weight-classes and physical attributes as they increased or decreased.

    Very much a technical v mechanical argument.