FURY press conference.. Classic

It sounds like you know your way around the forum very well for an apparent ''newbie''. A newbie who joins and jumps straight to this thread to hound me about bets that happened over a week ago

You use the same redundant words as all the other clowns stalking me on here simply because they don't like the truth.

And then you want to play dumb and act like you never watched boxing

Now I got you breathing on me like a rash, checking my profile and how long I've been on here, because you're apparently upset about a bet that had nothing to do with you.

What you think I was born yesterday?

Let me tell you something, I don't care about no online rep, my confidence in who I am and WHAT I DO does not derive from a alias or opinions on an obscure forum filled with mostly morons and fanboys who have no idea what reality is.

If I cared that much, I'd have aborted this account and created an alt and wouldn't get no grief. But there is nothing to hide from, it's all hot air and bs I'm hearing that I can easily refute with facts.

 

You're an excusing making weasel. Nobody forced you to start taking bets - YOU - started giving it large, challenging people to gamble with you saying you were going to delight in taking peoples money and having them struggle.

For whatever reason, you were unequivocally wrong and now like the soulless degenerate that you are, you've bottled out of paying out what you owe.

 

No one loves a

This content is protected

. No one. :nono

 

You can also say

This content is protected

. Both are grammatically correct. :good

 

[yt]9kkjr4qcrkE[/yt]

 

Wow primal....there out in force to get you lol

 

It's all good. I like knowing that they're all going to bed twiching in their sleep with night sweats over this whole thing, which means nothing to me.

 

A couple of hundred quid makes a big difference to you, you absolute joke.

And no, it doesn't make a difference to me. You're just another name added to a long list of known weasels.

 

if you say so

 

I do say so. My word is my word. Yours clearly isn't.

 

Since I'm not a gambling person, I had to check out the rules that bookies have in place when there are issues relating to rigging and if they will still pay out, since you hounds have been making out they still honor it regardless. Yet here are their rules

So it looks like it's stanard procedure to withhold payment on the basis of rigged events.

Shana was a good alt btw.

 

All bookmakers paid out for the fight. Why are you being different?

 

I regularly use other vbulletin forums, but only found this one last week and my first post was a new thread I started in the general section. It was only after that I browsed the UK section and read your ludicrous posts. Believe what you want, you're wrong either way.

Couldn't care less if you were speaking truth and it turned out the fight was thrown, as I've said all along you should pay regardless - especially as you have no proof, and every other bookmaker has paid out.

The bet has nothing to do with me; just saying, at a minimum you shouldn't be allowed to make bets with other people in future, because lets face it, a welching miser like yourself will never pay out on losses, but will most certainly claim payment when you win from unsuspecting victims who never knew they were being freerolled in the first place.

Welchers gonna welch.

And I bet you can't find a single case where the bookmaker didn't pay out because of a rigged event.

 

.

/

 

There are plenty of examples. Davydenko v Vassallo-Arguello in tennis is the obvious one that springs to mind.