Ones been knocked over more times than a wacky waving inflating arm flailing tube man yet maintains his still a top fighter. The other mentions or the big names in the division then goes and beats up on swiss milkmen. Whose the worse culprit to you guys?
Hard to say really. Haye is more a con man, Khan genuinely thinks he is amazing. Probably Khan being more delusional, yet Haye is more insulting to the general public.
I'd agree with that. Haye's comeback opponents have been such a joke. Khan actually seems to believe the **** that comes out of his mouth.
What big risks are these? Canelo was the lowest risk fight he could have taken and for the most reward. It's clear to Khan and his team (and the public) that there are no winnable fights for him now at world championship level, so facing Canelo was the best options because he could use the excuse of weight to try and save face. Khan is done and won't win a meaningful fight ever again.
Khan by a mile, at least Haye has a fighting chance against opponents, Khan's pre fight boasts are laughable, the world knew Garcia would ice him, we all knew Canelo would KO him, yet he expects people to think he can win, biggest turd in boxing PERIOD.
Exactly my thoughts. I've been a huge Haye fan and a staunch defender of his but he's all about the £££s. Briggs wasn't great 10/20 years ago, he got beaten by a fat old foreman (it was a robbery) when he was in his prime, fighting him now and proclaiming it a big fight is a joke. 3 bums in a row...I'd forgive him if he fought Briggs in July and then fought someone half decent later in the year, but 3 cans in a year...joke...
There's articles in the newspaper of David haye saying he wouldn't be watching vitali Briggs coz it's boring and no one wants to see vitali beat up on a guy with asthma and then the guy goes and fights him years later saying it will be a dangerous fight he makes me sick sometimes