Shane Mosley vs Aaron Pryor at 140

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Babality, Jun 18, 2016.


  1. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,135
    14,944
    Dec 6, 2008
    Who wins this? I think Mosley has the chin, speed and power to knock the hawk out in a war.
     
  2. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    147
    Dec 7, 2015
  3. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    147
    Dec 7, 2015
    your poll is a **** so i had to pick pryor by ko but i meant tko
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,403
    9,347
    Jul 15, 2008
    Let me tell you that this is a monster fight .. Mosley very under rated at 135 .. with his terrific speed, power and chin he may edge the Hawk or he may not .. Two exceptional , natural 135 pound fighters ..
     
  5. Rafaman

    Rafaman Active Member Full Member

    1,009
    439
    Jun 26, 2015
    Its a true pick em fight.

    The more I think about it the more I lean slightly towards Mosely.

    I slightly lean towards Mosely just based on his size (almost 3 inches taller) and proven chin holding up at 147 and 154. Both guys will certainly test each other. Pryor's non-stop offense might actually find its match in this fight. Mosely can bang to the body and won't shy from exchanges and might have faster hands than the Hawk. I think Pryor is one of the top 5 greatest pressure fighters of all time but I don't like this match up for him.
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,403
    9,347
    Jul 15, 2008
    He never fought anyone as good as Shane , as fast with that power and an iron chin .. a superfight.
     
  7. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    Shane


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  8. Confucius

    Confucius Active Member Full Member

    538
    10
    Jul 8, 2011
    This is a true pick'em fight, I think. Shane has generally superior physical tools (except maybe chin), but Pryor has better intangibles (and I don't mean just Panama Lewis!).
     
  9. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,453
    Jan 6, 2007
    Toss-up at 140. Going with Pryor by SD because he had beaten some "legends" Cervantes and Arquello when the chips were down (plus a win over Hearns in the amateurs).
     
  10. Confucius

    Confucius Active Member Full Member

    538
    10
    Jul 8, 2011
    Too much is made of the result of that particular amateur fight.

    First, obviously, amateur rules tend to favor the volume puncher over the knockout artist. Second, Pryor was, I believe, 20 or so when that fight took place, and Hearns 17. So it was a man fighting yet an un-developed teen. Third, contrary to the claims of some (though less so now that actual footage is available via Youtube), the fight was very close.
     
  11. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,453
    Jan 6, 2007
    The bottom line is Pryor won.
     
  12. Flex Luthor

    Flex Luthor New Member Full Member

    12
    0
    Jun 18, 2016
    Can go either way. Trust me I REALLY dont like Shane Mosley but he has nice combinations and a cast iron chin. Pryor was relentless but could box when he wanted.
     
  13. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,403
    9,347
    Jul 15, 2008
    That fight, on Youtube was extremely close .. in addition, Pryor was the vastly more experienced fighter. Hearns was a stick thin 17 year old at the time ..
     
  14. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    147
    Dec 7, 2015
    no, it was not " extremely" close, pryor won it clearly being the aggressor
     
  15. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    This pretty much mirrors my view of the fight as well. Fight could go either way, but if I were betting money I'd pick Shane, either way it would be a real dog fight.