Who do you rate higher p4p?

Kovalev has proven he can compete against world level opposition, so its only fair to use his resume to gauge his over all skill.

GGG has mostly beat regional level opposition, so while he looks impressive KO low-qulity mostly regional opposition, its hard to guage his skill set since he's not used it against top level comp.

 

GGG easy.

 

Regional level opponents?

Well who should he of been fighting instead at 160?

 

Kovalev easily.. His level of competition proves it.

 

And then you'll look like a bigger idiot when he finally steps up and loses. Overhypers!atsch

 

I smell Gorilla **** in a cave. One log looks like Italian sausage. The **** is all over the place!

 

Kovalev. Because he already had the chance to obliterate the so called "names" in his division, while they only talk about fighting GGG and then run with their tails between their legs.

If you go with potential, then Golovkin is the better of the two and so is Loma.

 

Exactly what is that world level competition?
50-year old B-Hop and Pascal?
I guess that's better than Golovkin's but is it really two levels up as people keep saying??

 

Everything GGG hasn't faced!:good And those wins are a few levels above Lemieux..

 

Kovalev

Why: Competition level.

 

Kovalev

Better resume.

 

Kovalev and it's not close. His resume is much better than gggs

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

 

Cleverly, Gabriel Campillo, (49 year old Hopkins-still competitive, can defeat 98 percent of all lightheavies). Pascal 2x.