Pavlik. Jones - not another opponent in his forties. Since his losses against Tarver and Johnson, he hasn't beaten a single TOP15 opponent. Tarver - not another opponent in his forties. Lost against Hopkins. So why should he fight him? Dawson - didn't look too good against Johnson. Calzaghe vs Dawson used to be the fight I was yearning for before Johnson-Dawson took place.
i thought he lost to hopkins, but that fight is done with now, i can't see him fighting pavlik at 160, roy jones brings everything he wants, a name on his resume so people in 20 years to think that he was a great, which he clearly isn't, and he also brings money.
definitly pavlik, for me no other fight makes sense in terms of boxing. for money, it would be rjj but who knows
Calzaghe has been calling Pavlik out ever since Pavlik/Taylor I. If he doesn't fight Pavlik before he retires, he ducked him.
me and 19 other people have to disagree mate, pavlik is hyped to **** on this forum and by all americans so if he is apparently good enough why not fight, joe has already said he would go back down to 168 if he was to fight pavlik, pavlik has fought at 166 pounds against jermaine taylor so the weight would not be an issue, i personally think pavlik has no reason to even think of sharing a ring with JC, but a hell of alot of americans think pavlik not only has the right to share a ring, but that he will knock joe out, so hey if pavlik is as good as everyone says he is then lets get this **** on, how can you say this fight makes no sense it would be the biggest fight of the year, which JC would inevitabley win by UD:good