Which heavyweight PEDS scandals are real?

There's a lot of BS with this post.

There are many cases of cattle in Europe raised with Clenbuterol. Clen reduces the quantity of fat while raising the muscle volume. At the same time the muscle retains more water. This obviously means much more value for the criminal rancher. This is why clen cases are sporadic. Not to mention there are countries (looking at you China and Mexico) that just plain don't give a five about it.

And back to Europe, yea there are cases of cattle being raised on clen, illegally. Oh look, clen doping rings in Spain. Beyond this, it's one thing to have trace amounts of clen, as Browne did but its a whole other to be actively using Clenuterol as a doping regiment. If you can't tell the difference between the two, stop regurgitating google.

http://velonews.competitor.com/2010...nbuterol-ring-used-in-horses-livestock_147239

Pov was cleared by the update of the WADA Code. The fact that you still say he's guilty makes your bs agenda clear.

Fury was alleged to have been caught for nandralone. UKAD could have run a CIR test and been done with it, but they didn't. This wreaks of foulness. The CIR test confirms whether any test in ones system is synthetic or not. Ya think they could have used that to confirm Fury's case? Gee... do they even want the truth???

 

The real BS is the tinfoil hat wearing apologists grasping at low level probability scenarios to clear doping violations. Go ahead....call BS....if you have indeed taken PEDs to give you real world knowledge of the effects, which I doubt, and have an academic background to actually be able to make heads and tails of valid peer reviewed research on the subject matter, and have no illusions about the relatively common place role of doping in all sports, then you would realize that these scenarios are less likely to be elaborate set ups, and more likely to be real.

 

Probably they all took what they are accused of taking, and more besides.

 

And if you had reading comprehension you would realize nowhere was it said, yes, 100% Browne and Fury are guilty, as there are tiny percentage scenarios where a false positive could exist from non PED sources....but these are low level outliers. Povetkin took meldonium. He's clear, but he took it at some point in time. That much is pretty inarguable. The timing we'll never know.

 

Fluid IVIayweather Ped

 

Povetkin won his gold in 2004, the allegations of Russian PED corruption were documented from 2011 to 2014. It is not state sponsored, just some corrupt people taking bribes to hide positive results. Also these are just allegations and boxing was not one of those documented sports who benefited from it, track and field was though.

 

It's a travesty that a known cheating scum like Fury is being allowed back into the ring to fight for the titles again. He should be stripped as soon as possible.

 

All 3 are bull****.corruption at its finest

 

Povetkin.