Joe versus Hops, both t 35 years of age?????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by beatdown, May 24, 2008.


  1. MattG

    MattG Member Full Member

    106
    0
    Apr 1, 2008
    I understand the age issue here, and I do think it would be a close call, but just as age is a factor so to are Calzaghe brittle hands. Where as Hopkins handicap is age Joes is just as important. I know people call him a slapper but I remember when he could knock good quality opposition out, he can't afford to hit with full power. So with that in mind, who would win? IMO I think Calzaghe has the edge.
     
  2. zarman

    zarman Guest

    i think calzaghe would have beat him easier than the fight they just had.
     
  3. thePRESIDENT

    thePRESIDENT Active Member Full Member

    640
    0
    Mar 31, 2008

    i think firstly Calzaghe would never face a BHop calibre fighter at 35. F Warren would not allow it.

    you would see a more agressive version of B Hop, a more physical fighter. I see him busting Joe up for a UD.

    But joe would make it a great fight, 1 thing about Calzaghe is that he is the kind of fighter who if he were in a a playground fight at school and he got beat up hed be back the next day to fight the same kid.

    Joe is a gutsy guy, but B Hop is just too good for him at his peak.
     
  4. Undisputed P4P

    Undisputed P4P esb FBL & FIFA 12 champ Full Member

    3,368
    1
    Apr 24, 2008
  5. rex11y

    rex11y Active Member Full Member

    558
    12
    Oct 17, 2007
    Hopkins lost, get over it!
     
  6. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    If they are both 35 Hopkins wins quite comfortably but I doubt Calzaghe would fight someone as good as a 35 year old BHop.
     
  7. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Calzaghe close UD
     
  8. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    :huh He won a controversial SD against a 43 year old BHop. Come on dude, this isn't a question of who wins it's a question of how BHop wins.
     
  9. standing 8

    standing 8 Active Member Full Member

    1,396
    1
    Sep 9, 2007
    Hopkins alll the way.
     
  10. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    Hops would win easy- but only because current JC has slipped since fighting the Dane. If both were 33 or younger JC wins
     
  11. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    That was only one fight ago. Could it not be that Calzaghe looked really bad because of Hopkins? He has a habit of making guys miss and hitting them with counters.
     
  12. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Well he may beat a 35 year old Calzaghe actually.

    But prime-prime, Calzaghe would win.
     
  13. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    True but fighters do suddenly slip

    I had the fight a draw or possibly JC by a rd. JC suddenly looked easy to knockdown. The weight seemed to suit BHop more than Joe which really surprised me, Joe seemed to have no power.
     
  14. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    Hopkins wins a very clear UD
     
  15. KilltheKing

    KilltheKing Overthrower Full Member

    895
    0
    Apr 1, 2008
    Hop by KO ... pretty clear after seeing them fight