Anyone else enjoy Fury's 1 year reign more than Klitschko's 10 year reign?

Can you send me the formula for how you calculated Wladimir's boxing age? This could be interesting...

 

Fury's "reign" will go down in boxing history as one of the worst in HW history.

 

You can't possibly know how old Wlad is in boxing years,

You can't possibly know how old Wlad is in boxing years, Jennings fight wasn't a fluke. I like Vitali a lot more than I like Wlad but Wlad would look unstoppable against Briggs and Sosnowski too.

 

Why can't I?

Wlad kooked poor against Jennings only because he was forced to box within the rules.

eXACTLY, both Wlad and Vitali only ever looked good against bums.

 

oh its been fantastic

no title defenses at all

just a clown wasting everyones time

LOL

 

Because you're trolling and talking out of your ass, as the last part of your post proves. Your calculation of "boxing age" has no base whatsoever.

 

I could go on and on about Fury's career. The win against legendary Christian Hammer, the two fights with Chisora, his awesome performance against Joey Abbell but his performance against Klitschko will go down in history as one of the great wars in boxing.

 

Well he has robbed us of straight fire classic Klitschko v Glazkov and we'd probably be highly anticipating Klitschko-Chagev II as we speak. Shame on Fury!!!

 

If you followed the division instead of getting excited about press conferences, you'd know that Chagaev would already be retired by the time Wlad fought the IBF mandatory. And even if he didn't, he wasn't next in line in WBA tournament, Ortiz was. Wlad would fight either him or WBO #1 Parker or another top10 contender after the IBF mandatory.

 

If you actually followed boxing rather than being a Klitschko fanboy you'd know that the winner of Fury v Klitschko was order to face Glazkov in 90 days of their win. Chagev fought after this period.

You'd also know that the tournament only came about because of the rematch clause and he couldn't face Chagev who was the regular champion, one rung above Ortiz, the tournament WBA they knew was never gonna happen anyway, it was just the usual WBA idol chit-chat.

Furthermore, you'd know that even if there was a tournament Ortiz was never able to agree to terms with Ustinov anyway.

 

If you read my post instead of being a butthurt hater, you'd know that I said AFTER the IBF mandatory. I follow boxing so I know that Chagaev vs Browne was ordered BEFORE any negotiations between Wlad and Glazkov could possibly begin, so a Chagaev rematch was out of question in any case. Wlad would fight Ortiz, Parker or Browne had he kept his titles.

You should follow WWE, more suitable for you, even there people demand occasional fights instead of getting satisfied with Batman costumes in press conferences.

 

Chagev v Browne wasn't agreed until mid December (after the Glakov-Klitschko negotiations would have begun). When Browne originally became mandatory for the secondary belt, it was knocked back because Fres Oqunedo was made mandatory again but was injured in the build to their rematch.

With Klitschsko and Fury tied up legally to a rematch, Oquendo mandatory for the secondary title out for the time being that's where this idea for a tournament came about.

Maybe you should follow WWE, where they can book what they want rather than deal with boxing politics for 3 belts and you can see your fantasy fights at Wrestlemania.

 

30 minutes of google search and this is what your comeback? LOL

Wlad/Chagaev was definetly out of question, why? Because Fury was also the WBA mandatory challenger, so with or without the Chagaev/Browne fight, Wlad wouldn't have to worry about another WBA mandatory for at least next 16 months.

Now back to watching and cheering for grown men clowning around in Batman/Joker costumes.

 

sounds like you should stick to wwe.

 

But his fights as boring as wlads