115-113 Hopkins, u could make a case for a draw... i started dozing off in the middle rounds so my card may not be 100% accurate
I was disappointed in this fight, I mean it was a fight that I was looking to for some time. I didnt really score the fight but felt like Hopkins won.
No judge gives "pity" rounds. The suggestion is ludicrous. There are plenty of 120-108 unaninimous fights around.
There are....but as I stated, there was'nt any rounds clearly dominated by either fighter, and although I gave Hopkins every round....he clearly was working hard for each round. I thought the fight was physically taxing on both fighters. Just competitive enough that rarely will you find a judge score a shutout, figuring this round is close enough that I'll turn to the other fighter. 120-108 scores are common in Calzaghe-Lacy type fights.....a fight clearly one sided and dominated by one fighter. That was'nt the case here.
Why the **** are some of you crying about the fight being boring? That was expected. :yep Bhops is a 42 years old fighter and he won't let any opponent control the tempo of his fights. I had it 117-111 for Bhops.
As of this time there are 6 people who voted for WINKY winning and 8 people a DRAW. I can't believe that ****. :huh Are these people boxing fans?
115-114 Hopkins. That some people call this for a good fight is beyond me. It was a boring fight, and I will never see it again.
The fight became just what I expected in terms of entertainment... Here´s my card: 1: Hop 2:WW 3:WW 4:Hop 5:Hop 6:Hop 7:WW 8:WW 9:WW 10:Hop 11:Hop 12:Hop 115-113 Bernard Hopkins who took away WW´s jab and got the best out of most trades. Pretty even rounds at most times, as expected. I think it was a good fight, didn´t expect anything else...not another result, neither another winner.