Does Lomachenko hide a despicable glass chin?

says the guy with only a handful of posts lol

 

From the tone of your post, it's clear that there was some knotting in the knickers, lad.

You have been so far unable to offer even a hint of refutation.

Of course I am correct. It's heartening to learn that you don't have a hankering for eating rat-$hit, merely spewing it.

Since you seem unacquainted with even the most basic maths, it would be futile to try to instruct you yet again.

From a glance at this thread, it's clear you have, in addition to literacy and numeracy concerns, very poor eyesight

 

The sheer irony!

A troll calling troll, in his own troll thread !

 

Every night in my dreams
I see you, I feel you
That is how I know you go on

Far across the distance
And spaces between us
You have come to show you go on

Near, far, wherever you are
I believe that the heart does go on
Once more you open the door
And you're here in my heart
And my heart will go on and on

Love can touch us one time
And last for a lifetime
And never let go till we're one

Love was when I loved you
One true time I hold to
In my life we'll always go on

Near, far, wherever you are
I believe that the heart does go on
Once more you open the door
And you're here in my heart
And my heart will go on and on

There is some love that will not go away
You're here, there's nothing I fear
And I know that my heart will go on
We'll stay forever this way
You are safe in my heart
And my heart will go on and on

 

Well lad, just like RESPECTED POSTERS and CHINCHECKERS are mutually exclusive, SERIOUS THREADS and CHINCHECKER THREADS are also mutually exclusive.


To go back to the mathematics of it, the set of CHINCHECKING THREADS which are also SERIOUS THREADS is empty.

Stated yet another way, all chinchecking threads are troll threads.


So in summary, this thread is every bit as 'troll' as your Calzaghe - Mayweather thread, where you established your top-shelf troll credentials.

http://www.boxingforum24.com/thread...s-floyd-jr-who-rates-higher-as-an-atg.577350/

(And I say this as a big fan of the Welsh Dragon and very much a non-fan of l'il Floyd.)

Even if this were true, which it isn't, it would have no relevance to the discussion at hand.

Ah... somebody's been thinking about mathematics, even if with very little comprehension. And it's this lack of comprehension, coupled with a basic inability to think cogently, that has led you to this erroneous conclusion.

You've perhaps heard of comparing apples and oranges ?


You have been on here for what, a week, maybe less ?
(At least under your present alt).

And for 100 % of that time, the forum has had " likes. "


I have been on here for about 10 years.

And for just over 1 % of that time, the forum has had " likes. "

So such comparisons are meaningless.


It would be like a nine year-old bragging that he spent a greater proportion of his life owning an iPhone than his grandad did. Pretty meaningless, given that for most of granddad's life, there were no iPhones.

(This example is probably beyond your grasp, but you could ask an adult to explain it for you.)


Now if you want to compare like to like in the reckoning of "likes," you could go back over this troll thread of yours and count the likes. At last count, i had ten.

You?

Nary a one !




Incidentally, your posting style and trollesque manner remind me of another troll who posted (and continues to post) on here.

He loved to prattle on about how many FaceBook friends he had, and such.


AngloSaxon, perhaps ?

 

No, Mr.F, again, you have it ass-backwards.

You posted a very obviously troll thread :

Does Lomachenko hide a despicable glass chin?

Given that there isn't the slightest iota of evidence for the stated premise, any more than, say,
Does Prince Philip hide a despicable tendency towards pedophilia?
the thread was obviously the work of a troll.

Thus, it was you, the thread starter, who attempted to make a joke and got called on it.

And not just by myself, who joked back with the assertion in my first entry, that...

This content is protected

You responded that you...

This content is protected

I further responded that my opinion was mathematically rigorous beyond dispute.
(clearly tongue-in-cheek as any nine-year old would know, much less a mathematics instructor)


You, completely oblivious to the obvious sarcasm, responded with...

This content is protected

Obviously !

But by now you were quite worked up that someone should hold their opinion to be mathematically provable.

You still weren't getting the sarcasm. It would be akin to saying "Theresa May is better looking than Maggie Thatcher and I can prove it mathematically."
(Well, maybe a poor example as it might be possible to actually prove that.)

And it went on from there.

You, indignant that I should bring maths into it.
Me, tugging your chain and pouring it on.

Of course I wasn't being serious !

I was (and am) quite serious in that it is my opinion that chincheckers are to be classed with trolls and unworthy of any measure of respect.

But I was posting tongue-in-cheek when I asserted that my opinions could be proven mathematically.

And the more indignant you became at that very notion, the better it got.

I will take you at your word regarding the second half of that sentence.

True !

Less true.

Ten years or so, off and on. If you check my history, you'll notice that most of it relates to much less frivolous issues around boxing.

That works out at around 7 posts per day.

You have 78 posts since Friday, or close to 20 posts per day.

So I'll leave it to you as to which of us spends "...rather a lot of time on here."

Well if that's the case, I have 48 and you have 17.
In this thread, I have 10 and you have 0.
(Not that I give the smallest of phucks, mind you.)

That's very laudable.

We have at least that in common.

 

Super Hans, is BOOTED!!

 

What aboutcha Bhoy? Not too bad on this end. Looks like I'll be in your neck of the woods in February. Probably going to visit the in laws. Many pints are always involved in that.

 

Just been reading this. Have to say, this 'cuchulain' fellow is rather embarrassing.

 

This post made my day... lmao
He got so badly owned by it, Nigel_UK.... sorry, I mean Mr_Farage clearly intentionally broke forum rules in order to be booted and escape his misery...

 

Mr Farage was booted ?

I wondered if he had slightly modified his av and handle.

So Nigel UK is the same character, back for more abuse ?


And do you know if he was on here in some other guise prior to last Friday ?