Fact of the day: Broner is a more exciting fighter than Mayweather post-Cotto.

And Donald Trump is a kind, honest man.

 

He is

 

And Barrack Obama was loved by all, that is why he lost the demotards the Presidency, the House and the Senate.

 

Ward was more exciting than Whitaker too.

 

Mayweather was born a boring fighter. Everyone is more entertaining. The only reason people watched him is because they wanted him to lose.

 

Obviously you started following this sport post 2010 and are a follower of Internet trolls whose sole purpose in life is hating on fmj ONLINE all day.

What clowns, (like you) fail to realize is your cult (the hate fmj cult) are some of fmj most loyal fans and are exactly the clowns fmj created money character went after.

Anyone who claims all his fights as "boring" is either trolling or simply unable to identify with what they're watching in the ring . The reason he's labeled boring is directly related to his greatness.

When a fighter is truly elite he will have very limited truly competitive fights. The greater you are the more hate you receive.

 

Like Tina Turner said, what's love got to do with it? BTW....I voted Gary Johnson, so Obama is irrelevant here.

 

Yes, clearly. Because anyone who deigns to not like Mayweather's safety-first, boring points wins are just not cultured enough. Or something. I mean fine, if you're eeking out those boring wins against the best in their primes. I'd respect the skill more then. But he rarely did that, if ever. Name me one other true great of the last 50 years who was or is deemed boring....

 

There were a lot of fighters more exciting than Mayweather. It isn't very exciting when you know no one has much of a chance of beating them. Broner is vulnerable and is such a head case you never know what he will do. He brings excitement to boxing.

 

I voted Gary Johnson as well, the polar opposite of Obumma.

 

Hi new boxing fan.