Would Katsidas kill Hatton in the ring?

errrr, because Jizm said that Katsidas is 'too powerful and too busy' for Hatton.

Actually, don't take any notice of him. He's full of ****, ask anyone.

 

Boppa, I ain't arguing with your analysis, it has some good points. I was just advising against retorts like 'Fatton' because it does you no good and can group you with some serious ****wits here....and I know you don't belong there.

 

he would be fighitn amir kahn in two years time and taking a beating of him rather than hatton.

 

having trouble reading you said hatton was almost put out by an out of work featherweight, which fighter is that :huh

 

And Kats has both in abundanceatsch

 

I think Hatton has fought more than four times out of the UK in his career.

I can think of at least six occasions!

 

not a featherweight thoughatsch

 

Yep although with Khans chin he probably wont ever get to elite. Although Hearns had a bad chin bad Hearns is Hearns and well Khan is well Khan.

Look im not saying he will or wont but if you think Khan will be able to bang with the future standouts like say Juan Diaz,Anthony Peterson,Michael Katsidis,Joan Guzman,Edwin Valero,Yuri Romanov.

All those guys have have hurt some guys with solid chins and i feel if Khan gets caught just once by any of those guys it will be good night.

 

i don't see how you can list kats with those guys he hasn't done anything of real note and is a level below them, sorry you could rank him iwth romanov maybe.

 

Still wow. Look i know he would be stupid to pass up on all that money he makes at Manchester.

But to say Kat doesnt stand a chance in this Power Brawl is just not true. Guys like Hatton,Katsidis etc with Power stand a chance to end it with just one punch in every fight they enter.

 

Boppa - Hatton was overprotected, but please do not start using 36 year old Tsyzu as an example of being protected and fed past it fighters. Tsyzu had just DESTROYED the 140 World Number 2. Everyone had Tsyzu as THE MAN at 140 but people asked if he was still in shape going into the fight against the second man in the division in Mitchell.

And Kostya destroyed Mitchell with far more ease and coolness than he had in 2001.

99% of pundits, boxers and fans picked Tsyzu to kill Hatton. You sure as **** were not on here saying he is 36, obliterating Mitchell means nothing, Hatton is being fed a finished fighter.
And if you go back and watch the first 6-7 rounds Kostya fought no slower, no more open, no different than he has ever fought. He was always quite flat footed, liked to fight at his own pace, but was wonderfully accurate, composed and had deadly power.

The one time he lost he was dragged deep by Phillips. He was not caught with a bomb, he was dragged out of his zone, made to fight at a pace he did not like and caught time and again....he was exhausted when Phillips stopped him.

He lost to Hatton in exactly the same way, the only reason nobody gave Hatton a chance was because Hatton gets caught and nobody thought he could take the power. But he did.

So whilst Hattons resume deserves criticism, Tsyzu being rewritten by revisionists as an old man is pathetic. Some fighters are shot at 32, others are at their peak at 36. Tsyzu was not at his peak, but he was not shot and the win was an incredible achievement that nobody else at 140 at the time could have managed.

 

Katsidis' chin doesn't look any better than Khan's going off evidence so far, anyway.