Who put on a better performance Khan or Brook?

You make no sense do you get it?
if brook canelo he would never get knocked out or come close to it and he would make canelo look very bad

If khan fought golovkin he would be flung out the ring

 

khan won more rounds then brook

But if brook fought canelo he would not just win rounds he would win by UD

 

simply put

khan would be flung out of the ring by GGG

brook fought the much tougher fight

 

Still do not reply to me but you have two quality posts above
Good day gringo

 

I expected brook to get destroyed in a round or two.

I expected Khan to outbox Canelo for the majority of the fight and then get KO'd.

Therefore brooks performance was better than khans as he exceeded my expectations.

 

Brook because I thought he'd get blasted out in a round or two whereas I thought Khan would outbox Canelo before eventually getting KO'd.

 

Khan will whoop ass @ 147.. plus he had the steel pin in his hand or something.. which is out now.. that can affect your power and chin.. like adamantite or something..

 

Uhh that's exactly what I meant.

 

Is that up for debate?

Brook went toe to toe with GGG and was competitive until he got injured and never hit the canvas, where as Khan ran for 5 rounds before getting brutally KO'd.

 

Viewed in a vacuum, Khan did better winning rounds easily.

In reality, Brook did better because he went toe-to-toe with the most feared puncher at 160 and held his own, whereas Khan managed to outspeed a plodder at 154 until he slowed down and inevitably got destroyed.

 

I see Yesihavearm beat me to the punch

 

Khan. But Khan wouldn't have lasted a round with GGG, Brook would have also given Canelo a better fight than Khan did.

 

Brook did better if both were the same size he would have beaten GGG. Khan is Khan, he's a front runner who always looks good early until he gets figured out and stopped an Canelo was aware of this going in.