Is Tommy Hearns a top 3 welterweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dpw417, Mar 7, 2017.

  1. 2piece

    2piece Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2014
    Messages:
    1,995
    Likes Received:
    278
    I definitely have Ray Leonard and Walker Smith Jr. ahead of him.
     
  2. Rope-a-Dope

    Rope-a-Dope Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2015
    Messages:
    10,138
    Likes Received:
    7,973
    Head to head I'd have him top 3 at both WW and JMW.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    50,922
    Likes Received:
    24,817
    How do people think a Keith Thurman vs Thomas Hearns fight at welter would look ?
     
  4. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    13,233
    Likes Received:
    11,546
    With Hearns controlling the action from the outside. Thurman would be caught in a maze. If he backs up he gets it worse than if he comes forward. I don't know how well he could fight his way inside. It would be a gut check for him. He`s got some nice tools. I didn't like the way he finished the fight last weekend. He boxed well but he didn't close the show. He can say he is a warrior but if in with Hearns he would have to show it.
     
  5. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    11,655
    Likes Received:
    4,376
    Agreed. But not legacy wise. His ATG Status comes from winning these titles far above welterweight
     
    ETM likes this.
  6. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    2,812
    Is it palpable... whatever irony you speak of?
     
  7. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    9,461
    Likes Received:
    347
    Personally I think Hearns would decision Thurman...not a stoppage. Thurman has pretty good movement.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    61,025
    Likes Received:
    45,249
    Hearns is getting way overblown here for his actual accomplishments at this weight.
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  9. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    9,461
    Likes Received:
    347
    They can't all be Rocky Marcianos...I guess...yeah?
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    61,025
    Likes Received:
    45,249
    Are you talking about the guy actually created a significant resume in his division?
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,578
    Likes Received:
    43,893

    The thread is H2H, nobody has been banging on about legacy. His ATG status absolutely includes what he did at 147.
     
    dpw417 likes this.
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,637
    Likes Received:
    28,914
    Does Armstrong beat Hearns at 147lbs? Benny Leonard was beating Britton until he went low.Could Walcott, being so out reached ,get in under the great jab of Hearns? I know he beat some heavies but were they anywhere as skilled or as fast as Tommy? Napoles was a great welter but prone to cuts and really a big light weight ,maybe Tommy would open his eyes up? Just thinking aloud.
     
    dpw417 likes this.
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    80,603
    Likes Received:
    21,210
    Yes he's number 3 at WW, I've just checked my list to confirm.
     
  14. Nick Balsamo

    Nick Balsamo Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    5
    I think that the consensus 2nd should be SRL, for about 75 % of expert.

    Then it's pretty open, but give me Gavilan 3rd, and then Napoles 4th. Hearns can be 5th or farther than that.