I think their egos would have made this fight closer than people think. In a perfect world, Joe would have kept his composure and outboxed him like your scores reflect. In reality, I think they would have taunted each other and had a few macho tear ups in the centre of the ring, resulting in a few exciting, but close rounds.
This is okay, but Glen obviously didn't believe that Joe was injured when he first pulled out. Also: Why did Glen have to beat Clinton? The fights with Clinton were close, and fights against either Glen or Clinton would have been better than targeting an NABF MW champ in Pavlik. They would also have been better than fighting Manfredo and Bika.
Why don't you get your crystal ball out and tell us while dismissing everyone else's opinions deeming them "illogical" Lol! ****ing DKSAB dork
Why did you bump this thread anyway?? Other than to stir crap up again while losing an argument and not accepting defeat?
Why don't you actually have a debate for once? I haven't dismissed EVERYONE else's opinion, which you'd have realised had you actually read my posts properly.
How am I stirring things up? How exactly have I lost an argument? Not accepting defeat? I too think that Joe could have won. If you don't realise my argument by now, it's better to just call it a day.
prime (probably early 30s given he had his best wins then)) "super" joe was a wbo titlist, an unknown title like ibo when he had it. or like that wbu title that homeless person recently won. there is nothing atg about that homeless person wbu title, nor about joes 90s-early 00s wbo one. However post prime joe went on to unify against injured kess if not defend other titles, and that was a step in the right direction, shame it was his only one.
Not his fault that glass chin fraud Jones and stay at home Borenard Hopkins were too afraid to take him on in his prime.
you are talkign about guys from other divisions. Not his fault that Ruiz and Valuev werent interested either until they turned 40something. ahem.
