Richardson feels Golovkin doesn’t have the experience that Canelo has.

He would outbox GGG and I agree Maidana is a more awkward dirty fighter, but GGG is just as accurate with his punches even if they are coming from more orthodox angle. He'd walk through anything Meather throws and MM isn't as good as cutting off the ring as GGG, yet had success against floyd. He suffocated him, and Floyd had to be saved by the bell otherwise he was going to suffer the same fate as his child Broner.

You are also right that Brook and jacobs both proved you can successfully outbox GGG, yet what was their fate? What did all their pretty boxing achieve in the end? It proved utterly futile against GGG's might.

 

Everyone could use an extra $100 million so please stop it.
Beating GGG doesn't do much for PBF he's already the best of his era it won't move him into the top 10 P4P ATG list. Who has GGG beat to make him a great win and elevate PBF up the ATG list? Jacobs? He's about to fight Canelo a guy PBF beat years ago. He's fighting PBF's leftovers. Had GGG beat Ward then fighting him would have meant a great deal and really done something for his legacy but he didn't.

 

A lot of those points are fair, but I can't agree about Chavez Jr. There would be an argument if they had fought 4 years ago, but as of 2017, JCC Jr wouldn't have got the fight without his father's name since his career has fallen off a cliff in the last 4 years.

BTW, you are obviously very confident about Canelo's chances, but would your opinion of GGG change if he did beat Canelo?

 

Listen to this miserable hater uttering nothing but wothless drivel.

Are you still going to call GGG a manufactured hypejob when he beats Canelo?

And please, just answer the question without any victim melodrama(you know what I'm talking about)

 

Of course it would have, I can't believe you have the audacity to pretend otherwise. GGG at the time of the talk surrounding him fighting Floyd, was known as the most feared man in boxing. Even casuals from all around the globe were tuning in just to witness GGG fight

Mayweather could have proven to the world that there was no one without a shadow of a doubt who was capable of beating him.

Instead he fights Berto. Tell me what did that do for Mayweather's career exactly besides padding up his record?

 

On Lara not at all. I believe at worse, the trend of G's aura of invincibility will continue even in a victory which has been the case since the competition has stepped up.

 

Saved by the bell come on man that's a desperate reach. What's not a desperate reach is that Jacobs made GGG look ordinary and slow and got the best of GGG in the exchanges at times. Jacobs in his own right is no speedster but was able to beat GGG to the punch and when he threw GGG would just simply shell up. PBF is much better at fighting on the outside and off his back foot than Jacobs can ever be. GGG can cut the ring off I'll give you that but that's against guys who aren't elite and are limited. What elite fighter has he cut the ring off against?

Oh you asked what did it prove? I'll answer it. It proved that once GGG stepped up in comp he isn't as good as his fans made him out to be. Brook exposed him and Jacobs arguably beat him a guy who's as good as GGG is supposed to be doesn't go life and death with a guy like Jacobs period. I can now see why GGG and his fans didn't want anything to do with Lara because even if Lara didn't win he would have wrote the blueprint on how to deal with him.

 

Floyd doesn't need $100 million dollars. He'd probably still get $20-$40 million for fighting GGG, maybe even more.

GGG is the Middleweight champion right now, who is undefeated. it would elevate Floyd's status in what you claim is an easy fight for him. Beating 0-0 Connor means absolutely nothing, only stupid suckers like you would pay for that farce of a fight.

 

Exactly. GGG is more proven at MW.

 

Take a look at 95% of your posts. You're other buddies have been banned recently. Don't follow their path Remy.

 

Still... you fail to answer my question which just proves what I expected. Calling GGG a caveman and a hypejob is very disrespectful to a man who has brought great honour and pride to this sport with both his infallable conduct and exciting ring style, all the while being unbeaten and in the process of making history.

And yet we have people like you on these boards who can not give him an ounce of credit and seek to limit him to being some kind of flash in the pan.

If that is really what you believe, then you need to educate yourself on the amazing feats he accomplished during his time in the amateurs where he went over 300 plus fights unbeaten.

What other boxer throughout history do you know of exactly who has been a hypejob that has done such a thing?

 

Feared by who? No hopers cans wishful thinkers and people who don't know **** about boxing? Real boxing fans saw through the GGG charade when Ward called his ass out and GGG ran off like a scalded dog and wanted a catch weight like a *****. Do you actually think an ATG elite fighter like PBF is scared of a guy who at that time best win was Martin Murray? LMFAO! Do you actually think an ATG elite fighter like PBF is scared of a guy who he holds and extreme stylistic advantage against and has the reach advantage to boot. GGG did nothing for PBF financially that's the real reason why he had no real interest in fighting him. GGG can't draw flies and for all his hype on boxing forums his fans don't buy his fights because his PPV numbers don't reflect it.

Lastly PBF fought Berto because it finished out his contract and the previous fight was against Pac in the fight of the era which was the biggest PPV and money fight in history something GGG knows nothing about. If he wanted to he could have retired in the ring after beating Pac he had nothing to prove after that he was proven to be the best fighter of the era at that point.

 

Oh Lord,
Most pathetic attempt at trolling on a child intelligence level.. brook had the speed advantage which enabled him to land a handful of shots. Ggg out boxed him in 4 of the 5 rounds with 2 being complete pummeling. What you guys think you see during fights is entirely baffling. Unless (would clear much up) we truly have 90% of all posting simply trolling.

Canelo, yes is the best opponent but tha t s 100% vise versa. Yes, canelo is better than jacobs, I don't know if he could beat him and it's a fact jacobs is a much tougher opponent for ggg. Simply styles and fighters make fights. Canelo will have a much more difficult time getting around ggg jab and reach, he also isn't going to be able to maneuver ggg like jacobs tried.

How are our sports fans clearly the most ignorant and bias of anything in life..WTF do you guys "think you're seeing" and how the duck can most MISS every important moment in just about every round. Maybe super sloMo x75 could help...

 

Have you bought a GGG ppv? I haven't. What is G exactly doing that no one else has. You write this huge paragraph for what reason? Will you admit he's a hypejob if he loses? I will call it as I see it as always.

 

Its not just experience with top level opponents, its how you handle that experience and what you gain from it. Canelo learned better defense, better punch placement, when to throw punches and when to feint punches because of the opponents he has faced...!!! IE: Canelo learned from his experience and that has made him a better all around boxer...!!!

Some boxers fight top level guys and don't learn anything from the encounters *cough* Oleg Maskaev *cough* *cough* Kingpin *cough*

This is GGG first real BIG fight, he has had many 2nd level big fights (Lemieux, Jacobs, etc), but none of this magnitude...!!! This fight is 50/50 and either guy can win, and when they win they should get all the praise and accolades they deserve...!!!

As a big GGG fan, I can see Canelo winning a decision, or trapping GGG on the ropes and securing a TKO victory; I don't foresee a Canelo clear KO victory though, but with his knowledge and experience, it could happen...!!!