Golovkin vs Brook performance clarification

Yes you,

'Golovkin was beat' 'The truth is Golovkin came out boxing, was losing or was ineffective'

Kell had his moments in couple of rounds but overall it was a beatdown.

 

Every fighter does that when they get hit, its basically covering up the fact the it hurt and pretending that you want more.

 

Brook would've beaten GGG but for the freak injury.

Spencer is half the boxer that golovkin is. This is going to be SOOOOOOOOOOO easy.

Yank fanboys will be hiding for the next 6 months lmao.

 

Alex are you just trolling?

Its clear as day Golovkin let Brook hit and he didn't care about it either I think you should watch the fight back in round 1 Golovkin found out he could badly hurt brook and then decided to make it more interesting letting him get back in fight
Golovkin could of got him out in round 1 he could get him out and he held back after

 

So what anyway? Do you think Bhop, Hagler, Pavlik didn't 'struggle' at times???

 

LMAO You mean the injury that was inflicted by GGG? Do you even understand this sport? It's a Fight.. You inflict maximum damage on your opponent to get the win. That is the whole purpose here.. What you are essentially saying here is if Golovkin hadn't have used punches Brook wouldn't have won! The injury was caused by Golovkins punches. There is nothing freakish about it..

 

Calm down fella.

Less than 36hours until the choklit brownehs are rained down up the hype jobs face. It's going to be glorious to watch.

 

no one else wanted to fight him then and it was a money fight only when he "appeared" to slowed down then other fighters got brave...........

 

At this point I'm forced to conclude every single possible criticism one could make of Golovkin is simply something he's voluntarily decided to do for the enjoyment of the fans (and a further reflection of his unparalleled greatness) rather than any kind of actual flaw.