Top 10 P4P List

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by There Will Be Blood, Jun 15, 2017.


  1. There Will Be Blood

    There Will Be Blood #TheMedicalTeam #750 banned Full Member

    3,848
    1,778
    Sep 6, 2016
    1) Pacquiao
    • Vargas (domination of a Top 10 welter)
    • Bradley III (domination of a Top 10 welter and elite fighter)
    2) Kovalev
    3) Golovkin
    4) Lomachenko
    5) Gonzalez
    6) Inoue
    7) Yamanaka
    8) Crawford
    9) Thurman
    10) Nietes

    Ward lost to Kovalev and was fighting bums leading up to the fight.

    Canelo lost to Lara, Trout, and Mayweather before going on a bum run of shot, undersized, B-level guys.

    Rigo hasn't done squat in 4 years except almost getting tooken out by a no name dude from Japan.
     
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,221
    36,461
    Jun 23, 2005
    Top 10 P4P WORST Top 10 P4P list I've ever seen.:deal:
     
    JordanK2406 and rhin0z> like this.
  3. RacingBeat

    RacingBeat Casual lives matter Full Member

    3,721
    1,294
    Sep 14, 2013
    worse than pimp's list. that being said mayweather shouldn't even be on it at all. for one he hasn't fought yet. for two it's against a 0-0 fighter
     
    latineg likes this.
  4. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,324
    Nov 18, 2009
    Lmao, there's no way Pac is #1, and arguable if he cracks top 10.
     
  5. There Will Be Blood

    There Will Be Blood #TheMedicalTeam #750 banned Full Member

    3,848
    1,778
    Sep 6, 2016
    Defend your argument.
     
  6. There Will Be Blood

    There Will Be Blood #TheMedicalTeam #750 banned Full Member

    3,848
    1,778
    Sep 6, 2016
    P4P lists are based on resume. Bradley's an elite fighter. Vargas was on a rampage. Pac dominated both guys. Name me one guy who had a better last 2 fights while winning dominantly.
     
  7. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,158
    May 30, 2008
    Golovkin far too high. No Mikey Garcia.

    I agree on no Canelo. I also don't mind Thurman's inclusion.

    I've honestly never seen Nietes so can't comment.
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,221
    36,461
    Jun 23, 2005
    No need to, your list does that for me.
     
    Ant Sutton likes this.
  9. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    This train wreck makes pimps pathetic list look like he almost took talent into account, you look like you picked from a hat of hundreds of random fighters geo's.

    This can't be what our fans had dwindle too. You should put your own list next to your nieces, which this has to be
     
  10. There Will Be Blood

    There Will Be Blood #TheMedicalTeam #750 banned Full Member

    3,848
    1,778
    Sep 6, 2016
    That's because you know that my list is unbiased unlike yours.
     
  11. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    It was worst than Racingbeats top 10 pfp.
     
  12. There Will Be Blood

    There Will Be Blood #TheMedicalTeam #750 banned Full Member

    3,848
    1,778
    Sep 6, 2016
    Break it down for me. What's wrong with my list?
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,221
    36,461
    Jun 23, 2005
    :risas3::risas3::risas3:
     
  14. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,579
    10,075
    Aug 1, 2012
    Who you beat has little to do with P4P. P4P has to do with skills. A lot of boxing fans have a large misconception about what P4P actually means.

    The reason why Floyd shouldn't be on the P4P list now is simply because he hasn't fought in 2 years and we have no idea what kind of shape he is in. P4P literally has to do with how skilled a boxer is, the ease at which he wins, his boxing IQ, how impressive his knockouts are, etc. Stuff like that. It amazes me how many people who call themselves boxing fans have no clue what P4P actually means.
     
  15. Ant Sutton

    Ant Sutton I love boxing Full Member

    666
    463
    Feb 21, 2017
    I find we're building a friendly rivalry lately but this isn't so bad :)

    But...you're way bias to PAC tho