Jim Lampley gives his opinion on what happened

Gee, Lampley seems oblivious to Ward's fouling. Amazing.

 

Doesn't work like that.

Ward could have been the "beaten fighter" in Round 2 of the first fight, and Joshua could have been the "beaten fighter" when Wlad knocked him down.

This analysis doesn't hold up.

The final punches of the fight were fouls. Those are the punches that stopped the fight, not anything that happened previously.

 

This is the same guy they were calling racist before the fight.

 

I fixed it for you and Jim. Thank me later

 

Lamps is spot on.

 

Oh NOW he's spot on huh?! What was he about a month or so ago? Weren't you one of the ones whining about him??

Lmao!

 

Lmao! Touché

 

One dirt bag put up a thread right before the fight and he and the rest of the usual suspects were all calling Lampley racist and saying needed to go.

 

Aside from that Kova didn't defend himself and was slumped over. IF you think a world class fighter can hit you in the nuts and you still be standing yeah think again. The shots whern't nutshots.

 

They were illegal shots, or at least the last one was.

The fight ended on a foul. Thus, we have no conclusive ending and the bout gets dragged down in controversy.

I wish it would have ended differently.

 

The final punch, singular. Only the last one was low.

 

I thought the last three were low, but I'd have to watch it again.

Pretty sure Duva said the same thing after the fight (last three low).