The Two punches that hurt Kovalev with 1:45 left in the 8th round were not low

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by shadow111, Jun 19, 2017.


  1. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    I don't see anyone claiming that those punches were low.
     
  2. Giacomino

    Giacomino Member Full Member

    326
    151
    Oct 15, 2016
    In a nutshell, you've basically summed up all the issues. Well done.

    And that should end the argument really - it won't, but it should. So i'm not even going to read any of the (no doubt) half-baked replies below :)
     
    Hookie likes this.
  3. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010

    Context clearly does matter. Weeks was closely monitoring Kovalev because he was in full survival mode, hands down, and had just fallen back into the ring post. That is the context. Weeks is looking to stop the fight because Kovalev is in serious trouble. He sees three consecutive shots, the first causes Kovalev to hunch over. The final one causes him to sink down and double over. Weeks instantly calls it off.

    Did he make a mistake? Well, if you have multiple camera angles and slow-motion it appears he did. Because, indeed, the final punch was low.

    But to say that the context doesn't matter is absurd. The context is critical in understanding Weeks frame of mind. He is not looking for low-blows or other infractions, he's looking at Kovalev's condition. And so he makes the call when Kovalev falls over.

    The reality, as many have pointed out, was that there are many ways this fight could have after the Ward onslaught. The way it did end was unfortunate. But the outcome, one way or another, was going to be a Ward win, and the premature ending really only prevented a more extended beating for Kovalev.
     
  4. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,813
    29,599
    Jul 26, 2004
    ~ what would have happened, or what was going to happen, is irrelevant

    ~ no, when discussing contexts, it matters only when wanting to understand HOW a bad stoppage was made, not IF it was a bad stoppage. Which are two entirely different discussions. I am obviously discussing not how it happened, but that its a bad stoppage.
     
    NewBoxingOrder likes this.
  5. Steve_Fox

    Steve_Fox Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,838
    212
    Sep 13, 2014
    kovalev was running
     
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,105
    4,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    So, SOB fans are claiming that Golota should finally get his title by beating Bowe two times with low blows! I have seen it in slow motion and SOB landed low blows, no doubt about it................
     
  7. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    383
    Dec 19, 2009
    Doesn't every real man? I do the same, I also run the penls down and then up the butt crack and tuck it under my belt in the back. Don't judge a man until you've lived a day with his mile long penls... or is it "don't walk a mile with no shoes while holding a man's penls" I'm not sure but what I am sure about is that those shots were low... some of you MoFos are blind!
     
  8. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,105
    4,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    Blows to the testicles are illegal, totally against the rules................................that's a fact..................but there are not rules for SOB....................