Which fighter do you think was better than the guy who beat him?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by andrewa1, Jul 2, 2017.


Which loser would have normally beat the winner

  1. Vitali (over Lewis)

    4 vote(s)
    21.1%
  2. Pac ( over Mayweather)

    2 vote(s)
    10.5%
  3. Wlad (over AJ)

    6 vote(s)
    31.6%
  4. Someone else (name)

    4 vote(s)
    21.1%
  5. No one, if you lose it means you are always the loser

    3 vote(s)
    15.8%
  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,957
    3,429
    Jun 30, 2005
    Michael Watson was officially 0-2 against Chris Eubank. He should be 1-1, the first fight was a gift decision for Eubank. Watson deserved the decision in that first fight.

    The second fight was tragic yet it led to some positive changes in the safety measures of boxing in the UK, and Watson has recovered well considering how close he was to death and compared to a lot of other boxers who suffered serious brain injuries.

    Watson was kicking Eubank's ass, but to his credit, Eubank landed a great uppercut and won fairly.

    But as far as the original topic goes, I'd pick Watson over Eubank more than 50% of the time if there's no freakish injuries or bad judges.
     
  2. MonagFam

    MonagFam Member Full Member

    493
    13
    Apr 4, 2013
    Controversial outcome, but I think Camacho and Haugen. Even back to back SDs going to each fighter almost doesn't seem right.




    Sent from my B3-A30 using Tapatalk
     
  3. Dfaulds

    Dfaulds Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,398
    2,043
    May 22, 2017
    Loma Vs Salido....
     
  4. qwertyblahblah

    qwertyblahblah Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,985
    2,063
    Jan 14, 2013
    Marquez against Bradley.
     
  5. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009