Here is a comparison of what Canelo is claimed to have landed with the number that he actually landed. 171 as opposed to 257 The difference is a whopping 87 punches. A difference of 86 punches clearly landed punches compubox claims to never have happened. That's like having a bell ring 257 times and saying you didn’t hear eighty-sevenof them. Or ignoring a third of the bells you heard. That's equivalent to subtracting four and a half rounds of Canelo punches. Talk about premeditated malicious bias! Canelo punches landed by round: 1. = 16 2. =26 3. = 21 4. = 12 5. = 19 6. = 18 7. = 21 8. = 21 9. = 21 10.= 30 11. =17 12. =35. Total punches landed 257 Total compu box bogus claim = 171 Probably Golovkin fans. BTW The punches which were unclear I didn't count.
I will watch the fight again and count them to see. I already posted how many he missed because he was getting credit for them. So I wouldn't be at all surprised to see all those misses, feints, pawings and taps posted as compubox punches landed. Now that would indeed be insane! But I will check and see if that's what they did.
I thought GGG landed a lot more than he was given credit for to be honest. He laid a lot of leathe on Nelo over the course of 12 rounds that I don't think he received credit for so if the compubox numbers were that off for Canelo and having the judges already in the pocket of GBP....more than likely the punchstats were manipulated in the same fashion. Don't be surprised if you find GGG's total landed spiking even more than what you found by watching just Alvarez's punch output.
Canelo got loud cheers for a lot of his shoulder glove impacts, I'm not going to bother counting for the sake of entertaining this thread but there will be swings and round-a-bouts with this but the best Canelo managed was a draw, he didn't win... the only debate is if GGG got robbed or whether it really was just a draw.
Actually, this was a GBP event. They had the luxury of choosing the ref and the judges being that Nelo was the draw. Their pockets are deeper and that's the reason we saw the judges cards favoring the Golden Boy fighter. If anyone bought or influenced the outcome there's no question that was Canelo and GBP. I think that the overwhelming consensus having GGG winning speaks to that. The interesting aspect is the people weighing in on the "draw" are pro boxers, analyst, boxing trainers and casual fans who all saw the fight the same way....Most everyone is calling it a robbery.
It will be interesting to see him recount the punches that landed for GGG. I honestly thought Golovkin landed a lot more than what he was credited for.
I have a sneaky suspicion that GGG will actually land alot less than computerbox given the totally unbiased view of the OP.. It may be another GBP robbery bad!!!!