What good is being the aggressor if your not really landing the punches???

Not much good at all.

On the other hand if you ARE landing the punches and have the other guy on the run, it means that you are winning the fight.

 

that's what happened in many Floyd's fights indeed
If you do land more punches though, it's a very good thing being the agressor. effective aggression

edit: wait... this is your first post here after you joined in 2010?!

 

He gave a good illusion that he was fighting but he didn't fool me one bit. Guy was just doing enough for self preservation and nothing more. He didn't come to fight. He came to just survive and hope the judges save him.

 

That was a disputed decision, but one of the many differences between that fight and this one was that Leonard actually landed more punches and at a much higher percentage. Not the case here. If you are backing up and looking to avoid combat more than initiate it, you had better at least land more punches than the other guy if you expect to win. That's how I see it.

 

Too many Magpies on here attracted to the flashy shots of Canelo, it was real flashy, very impressive but too few and far between and it never really stopped Golovkin doing what he was doing.

 

like canelo lara and dlh whitaker???? i wondered the same but we got blackeye dec in both

 

Well it sure makes the other guy feel like, WTF can I do to make this guy stop pressuring me for one thing.
It's just as much a mental game as a physical game

 

As does Canelo

 

There are guys making batches of alts at a time and leaving them to mature. A few months ago there were a bunch of new posters around making comments like "." and "yes" and "agree" on threads and then vanishing after 3-4 posts. In a few years the usual OCD guys will unveil them as their other accounts slowly get banned one by one because of being giant peni.