Joshua and his mandatories

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cornish, Oct 11, 2017.


  1. Cornish

    Cornish Member Full Member

    150
    107
    Oct 10, 2017
    Eddie Hearn says Joshua can't fight Wilder even if he wanted to, because he has to box off his mandatories otherwise he'll lose his IBF strap, but that's bull****. Before Klitschko retired, Joshua was lined up to fight him in a rematch. Why wouldn't Joshua have lost his IBF belt in the Klitschko rematch? Klitschko wasn't ranked no1 with the IBF, he couldn't have been because he had just been beaten. The IBF said nothing of Joshua being de-strapped for the Klitschko rematch so why would they say it for the Wilder fight? It don't make any sense.
     
  2. dellboi94

    dellboi94 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,108
    1,679
    Sep 3, 2013
    Joshua was granted an exemption for Klitsckho rematch by the IBF but in the event that Wlad retired the IBF stated that he has to fight NO.1 Contender Pulev.
     
  3. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,738
    29,678
    Jan 18, 2010
    That exactly. They had been negotiating for that and there was that issue of the WBA belt (Ortiz) as well.
    And now that Ortiz vs Wilder has fallen trough, I won't be surprised if Joshua vs Ortiz is up next after Pulev.
     
    Cornish likes this.
  4. Cornish

    Cornish Member Full Member

    150
    107
    Oct 10, 2017
    So who will Joshua have to fight after Pulev for his WBA mandatory if Ortiz gets a ban?
     
  5. anjawnaymiz

    anjawnaymiz Can we get Ivan Dychko some momentum Full Member

    8,263
    6,075
    Sep 6, 2008
    hopefully Ustinov, would be a fun fight
     
  6. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,181
    13,225
    Feb 13, 2014
    Ortiz hasn't been banned by the WBA, I don't think. It's just the WBC. So currently he would still have to fight Ortiz. If not I think their number 2 is er...Ustinov
     
  7. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,738
    29,678
    Jan 18, 2010
    The WBC didn't ban him either. They changed it into an health issue, like they were concerned he would be fit enough to enter a boxing ring with his high blood pressure. He now has to prove via doctor reports that he's "fit to fight".
     
  8. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,181
    13,225
    Feb 13, 2014
    Oh, I didn't know that I thought he was just straight up banned. Then I guess Joshua-Ortiz is still very much on the cards.
     
    Robney likes this.
  9. Cornish

    Cornish Member Full Member

    150
    107
    Oct 10, 2017
    How could Hearn justify an Ortiz fight for the WBA strap, when he came out saying all that about Ortiz should be banned? We all know he said it because he wanted to mix things up to get Whyte a fight and he'll look pretty hypocritical accepting any Ortiz fight now after that.
     
  10. Beez

    Beez Active Member Full Member

    643
    539
    May 11, 2017
    Guess he wont have a choice if its forced onto him by the WBA... maybe the WBA will give them some leeway now to fight someone else
     
    Cornish and dellboi94 like this.
  11. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,181
    13,225
    Feb 13, 2014
    Because Hearn is a massive hypocrite. IMO he only signed Ortiz to keep him away from AJ for a bit. Whyte has a failed test too as does Kid Galahad but Matchroom had no issues with them being on their shows.
     
    Cornish likes this.