Send in an ATG to beat RJJ at 168

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by surfinghb, Dec 16, 2017.


  1. surfinghb

    surfinghb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    17,587
    Aug 26, 2017
    Names? how you see it going
     
  2. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,230
    12,606
    Mar 26, 2009
    Ottke in Germany

    How I see it going?A UD for Ottke
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  3. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,027
    5,550
    Oct 5, 2009
    how bout a more seasoned Hopkins moving up
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,153
    42,077
    Feb 11, 2005
  5. J Jones

    J Jones Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,828
    1,413
    Jul 19, 2017
    Do not be fooled by Roy’s record post 2004. Nobody in history beats him at 168 in his prime. Bet your life savings on it.
     
    Contro likes this.
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,353
    41,273
    Apr 27, 2005
    The easy answer for me is Ezzard Charles. We know he'd make 168 some time after the war and man would he be hard to beat.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,835
    45,550
    Mar 21, 2007
    1) Same but different. Lloyd Marshall. Unpredictable, a hard puncher who used strange angles and moves to upset the rhythm of his opponent. At his very best he would be in a difficult and wonderful fight with Jones I think.

    2) Unknown. Harry Greb. Enormous work rate, iron-chin and he's not too small - he fought two very very close fights with one Gene Tunney while weighing 166lbs. Unpredictable defensive genius.

    3) Boxing genius. Ezzard Charles. In 1947, Charles weighed in at 169lbs if we can stretch a point. After 1944, he lost only to heavyweights, and he beat more than a few. He stopped Marshall in the 169lbs fight; in the six months either side of this he beat Archie Moore, Billy Smith and Jimmy Bivins. I think this fight could be surprisingly crap as they both break up one-another's styles, but Charles has a good chance.

    These would be the three I'd go for and if I had to pick one i'd probably go for Charles.
     
    BCS8 and jyeahfosho like this.
  8. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,735
    12,859
    Oct 20, 2017
    In terms of guys who actually fought in the super middleweight division, it's hard to think of anyone who could have beaten Jones. The two most accomplished fighters in that division's history in terms of achievement were Calzaghe and Ward. I think they both could have presented Jones with his toughest career fights, particularly Ward as his boxing fundamentals were so solid and he was strong enough to handle Jones well if he could get inside. But even then, I can't see Jones losing.
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Bob Fitzsimmons in a 25+ round fight :D
     
  10. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,456
    10,439
    Jan 6, 2007
  11. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,050
    11,204
    Mar 19, 2012
    It would be a tall order. Roy was out of this world at `68. Ezzard Charles would be a good one to go with. Perhaps Jake LaMotta. He wouldn't have to struggle down to `60. The Bull would be able to pressure Roy every minute of every round and use those rough tactics that sometimes worked on Sugar Ray.
     
    surfinghb likes this.
  12. juppity

    juppity Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,342
    4,343
    Dec 28, 2016
    Billy Conn for the first Louis fight came in at 174 lbs . And it was rumored
    he was really 169 lbs. So if Ezzard Charles name can be argued then so
    could Billy Conn.
     
    ETM likes this.
  13. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Moore maybe? Probably not experienced enough yet though.

    Jones was incredible at 168 and the division is very young, so there are not many around to pick really. IMO to beat Jones you need to a) put a lot of pressure on him, b) be incredible good at cutting of the ring, c) have decent power, very good accuracy and timing and d) it would help to fight "off-rythm". To be honest Calzaghe actually fits three of those 4 points but falls short on point c. But wth his very high workrate he might eek out a points win. Unlikely and probably unpopular but possible.
     
  14. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    133
    Feb 6, 2009
    I think Calzaghe is well in with a shout.

    I think Jones could well annihilate him, knocking him out, but I'd definitely give Calzaghe a shout.
     
  15. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    133
    Feb 6, 2009
    But then Calzaghe probably isn't an all time great so maybe an irrelevant post.