The official Mayweather vs. Pacquiao aftermath trash receptacle

Floyd is far greater than him!! And everyone knows that!!!

 

When he was caught with the IV it should have been an instant ban but that did not happen. The reason why is because deep inside the contract was buried a clause that allowed USADA to not have to report the serious infraction. Why would there need to be a clause/loophole to allow USADA to not disclose any adverse findings first of all? That boggles the mind. It defeats the whole freaking point of anti-doping. In layman's terms this allowed USADA to ignore their own ****ing rules, which are those of WADA.

This is why Bob Bennett from NSAC blasted USADA for daring to issue any TUE. USADA has no authority to issue a TUE. Then oh****ingsnap, someone set Bennett straight and NSAC did a 180 and accepted the TUE from an agency that has no authority to issue said TUE.

All of the above is clearly proof of doping, but what's even more disgusting is that Fluid clearly intended to DOPE. This was their plan, to take a super ****ing dose the night before and wash it away with the IV. And this premeditation came in the form of the contract clause that told USADA to report any adverse findings to the promoter, in this case GBP.

This ****er Fluid planned to cheat all along. And one has to wonder why NSAC did not allow Pac's legal request for a pain shot before the fight, yet they do a 180 and accept the 19 day late/hidden TUE? I've not seen a more obvious case of collusion, deception, and corruption in boxing in a long ass time.

 

Void is afaid to rematch Pac, unless Pac only has one arm...................Void is a cheater, his last fight was a sick joke, against a person who was not a boxer, had a 0-0-0 record! Should not count at all................Castillo and Oscar beat Void, but Void owned the judges as usual..........

 

I think Pacquiao's fights with Tim Bradley are really instructive, in that you have an athletic, astute (when he wants to be), tough, determined challenger who had three bites at the cherry, who took different approaches into their first two bouts and then tried to combine the best of each performance in a rubber match, yet still couldn't do enough to register a convincing W over a four-year period wherein Manny aged from 33 to 37.

I have a pretty high regard for Bradley, and I find it a pretty firm testament to Manny's quality that Tim couldn't manage to catch him slipping on one of those occasions.

Pacquiao is a really difficult guy to get one over on, and the appearance of beatability he offered at times in and around his prime (most notable throughout the Marquez rivalry) was rather deceptive. Even Mae(stro)weather was an unemphatic winner, by my lights, when the fighters met past their respective peaks. I didn't have a wide scorecard for that one - I thought Floyd did just enough to say he won it fair and square, 115-113 conceivably stretching to 116-112, but no wider margin seemed justifiable to me.

 

What does this same old bs that you have been pedaling for years have to do with my post. I was alluding to that fact that mvc ( you know the leader of the Mayweather groupee fan club of whom you are 2nd in command) starts a thread about Pac which instantly backfires and ends up having to defend Mayweather all over again. Like you he is a loser. By the way, like someone else said, don't dictate to anyone about how to appraise Mayweather's greatness. Who do you think you are? F fascist!

 

Pacquiao is the GOAT. Sorry if this upset anyone.

 

I don't think anyone takes it too seriously

 

Who would you choose?

I would go with Mike Tyson vs Joshua

 

SRL vs. SRR

 

Leonard-Hearns might have done it if it were today.

 

Hell even Oscar - Canelo would come close to breaking it.

 

Ali vs Tyson or SRL vs SRR would do it. Kudos to kirk and IB for those. I was thinking maybe Greb vs Robinson, Holyfield vs Marciano, Ezzard Charles vs Michael Spinks, Monzon vs Hagler, Jose Naples vs Ray Leonard, Benny Leonard vs Duran, Armstrong vs Sanchez, etc.

Really though, whoever you want, it could be you versus your grandfather and the pay per view sells itself. "So we got a time machine and..." "What!" 10 million ppv. If we want to think a little bigger we could go Hitler vs Stalin or Mao vs Genghis Khan.

 

PPV of the Millennium
Charles Martin vs Bermaine Stiverne
Ishe Smith vs Sechew Powell
Chris Algieri vs Paul Maliniaggi
Zahir Raheem vs Derrick Gainer