Who exactly has Terence Crawford beat? His resume is Weak

“B.. Bu.. But Postol doe!”

 

Well for sure he’s had everything go his way as politics ect make unifying so difficult,he beat what was in front of him.
Postal is probably his best win and he basically did an Andre Ward on him,I’ve no doubts he’s gonna do some great things though and I still have him top three PFP.

 

I think you’ve got a bit of revionist history going on there. When he fought Postol it was seen as a great matchup. Only after Bud took him to school did people say Postol is overrated, which is a pretty good way to minimise Crawford’s skill and win. Also I think it’s a massive stretch to say he struggled with Gamboa. Sure he got rocked once but he beat the **** out of Gamboa.
Those things aside, yeah his resume isn’t stellar. But I mean some of the guys he beat are far from cans, and he didn’t just beat them all, he made them all look hopelessly outclassed. That has to count for something.

 

Saunders without singing it from the rooftops and having the same hype train as Crawford has built himself a very solid resume,so funny how Charlo getting heaps of praise and as yet has done nothing at Middleweight whereas Saunders has done loads already in terms of facing quality,who else at 160 other than Golovkin has resume like BJS?

 

That does count for something,anyone doubts should ask James Degale what can happen at this level against anyone lest you’re at you’re best.
I’m a big fan of Crawford and Lomochenko both are showcasing their skills and both have to move up in weight just get challenged.

 

I know. I have been accused of “Saying Postol was gonna whoop BUD doe!” when I never, ever talked up the guy on here and I never made a comment about Postol in that fight.

 

Yep what would you say B plus level?

 

All his fan boys are really overrating alot of his wins I mean winning a vacant title at light welter against a fighter who had done nothing to that shot and then dierry Jean terrible Hank Lundy John Molina I mean if that's not a hall of fame p4p resume I don't know what is lol now the champions he fought postal best win Lucas shot lol going life and death with Molina made that clear and postal went life and death with lundyeand indongo did he land the perfect punch to win the title or did he smash a glass jaw and he beat burn lol that a joke that's no great win

 

Who did Lomachenko beat?, Rigondeux who was inactive and moving up?, Miguel Marriaga moving up and coming of a loss?, Gary Russell who hasn't beaten anyone of note?.
Who did Golovkin beat?, Brook moving two weightclasses?, Barely beat Jacobs who was stopped by Pirog, Gabriel Rosado?, David Lemeiux who lost to Marco Rubio?
Who did Usyk beat?, Michael Hunter who doesn't have a good win?, Briedis who gave him hell and was the underdog?
Who did Spence beat?, Kell Brook coming from a loss and moving down in weight?, Lamont Peterson who was stopped in three rounds by Lucas Matthyse?
Who did Joshua beat?, The ghost of Wlad coming of inactivity and a loss?
By your standards everyone in boxing is a bum, Crawford cleared the division, maybe Postol wasn't that good but people were talking about how Crawford was going to duck him, the same for Indongo.

 

There’s Resume and there’s the Eye Test. Often a fighter’s resume doesn’t tell you as much as the Eye Test does.

Spence is a good example of this.
Crawford is another. They are both better fighters than their resumes would indicate.

All the chatter before the Brook fight was “Spence’s resume is not that good. Spence is not that good.” People saying this were not looking at Spence and how he fights. They were not using the Eye Test.

It’s the same now with Crawford. His resume doesn’t tell you everything. You’ve got to look at how he fights.

 

Almost all there wins are much better then Thomas durlerme dierry Jean Hank lundy John Molina lol