Ruben Olivares - As great as Monzon?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Feb 6, 2018.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,443
    12,845
    Apr 1, 2007
    The more I learn about the career of Olivares the more impressed I am with the man and his accomplishments. He was the boxing equivalent of James Dean, living fast, hard and just about dying in the ring late in his career to complete the comparison between the two.

    I've seen some of his very last bouts (And filled in the boxrec pages with information regarding a few of them if anyone cares for more info without digging the fights up) and he fought until he was beyond shot and could no longer even take a solitary decent punch. Similar to other greats who've continued on, like Roy Jones Jr, these once universally revered and great careers are dragged through the mud for years, resumes accumulating embarrassing losses. Some fight fans will say these post prime losses where the fighter in question was a shell of his former self don't muddy the water, but it inevitably takes some of the lust off the fighter as a whole. It's simply how it is. Getting out of the sport at the right time before your record is diluted in the eyes of the casual observer is way to be deemed indisputably great. Think Monzon's 87-3, JCC's 107-6, Hagler's 62-3, Rocky Marciano vaunted 49-0.

    Olivares in his prime was undoubtedly a great fighter, as destructive an offensive machine as I have ever seen at the lower weight classes, with great punch accuracy, one of the greatest left hooks to the body of all time and respectable guile and skill. In more than one publication I've seen Olivares referred to as once being the premiere, all time most revered greatest fighter out of Mexico... A title that people later on in all their hoopla and promotion ended up seemingly moving that title onto Julio Cesar Chavez (Which I completely disagree with)

    Olivares challenged himself in several matches where he was at a severe disadvantage from the get go. While plenty of JCC's career included plenty of record padding, and once he made his own move up in weight made sure to not match him against anyone who would be particularly dangerous to him. Olivares made the old school jump between the bantamweight and featherweight class, to meet one of the rangiest and biggest featherweights you can think of in the great Alexis Arguello.

    Now Arguello is a fighter that is almost dead even with Chavez in terms of perceived greatness and accomplishments on this forum... So what does it say about Olivares that he moved up multiple weight classes to take on such a stylistic nightmare to himself while he was well past his prime and to be leading in the fight before being caught late?

    If Chavez were to take on a similar challenge, it would have been along the lines of matching up against a young Ike Quartey, or Vince Phillips, fighters who would have large reach and size advantages over Chavez, with exceptional physical tools to boot. Basically, nightmare style match ups for an aging Chavez, a suicide match. Olivares did something exactly as mad as that, and he almost won!

    Obviously Olivares was a fighter who burned brightly for a relatively short period of time, and Monzon was far more consistent. But I feel like I can tell greatness when I see it, and my question to end the thread on is this... Is it unrealistic to think Ruben Olivares is as great a fighter as the likes of Carlos Monzon, one of the consensus top middleweights of all time?
     
  2. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,443
    12,845
    Apr 1, 2007
    This content is protected
     
    OvidsExile, Clinton and JC40 like this.
  3. JC40

    JC40 Boxing fan since 1972 banned Full Member

    1,098
    1,866
    Jul 12, 2008
    Good onya Russel, Rockabye Ruben wasn't as consistent as Monzon was as you said but I would rate him P4P a better all round fighter. At 118 he was a monster but he could also box VERY well. His display of speed, angles and in n out footwork against Arguello was at the very highest level.

    He sure loved the senioritas n partying though which ultimately lead to his downfall as a fighter.

    Cheers Man.
     
    Russell likes this.
  4. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,443
    12,845
    Apr 1, 2007
    Olivares had the ability to dent and outright brutalize even the sternest of chins, and this was the 15 round era when they would gleefully let two guys attempt guys kill one another over the course of 45 minutes. He was a truly dangerous puncher who could cripple almost anyone he fought with a clean left hook.

    Consider this, years past his best he blew out a 43-1 Jose Luis Ramirez. A prime Edwin Rosario landed every punch imaginable on the same Ramirez and didn't come close to duplicating the result. I don't believe the Ramirez/Olivares fight is available, but I've heard that it was the result of a debilitating body shot.

    A prime Rosario with two tries and Chavez showed they could hurt him to varying degrees up at 135. Stop? Nope. Not by Rosario, a surgical punch placer in his prime with huge power in both fists, with one shot power or a prime Chavez managed to do the kind of damage a blown up, ex bantamweight accomplished in two rounds.

    He also blew up one of the toughest men to ever stop inside the squared circle, the endlessly brave Bobby Chacon, in just two rounds. Again, years past his best. He was an offensive force that not many can compare to.
     
  5. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,443
    12,845
    Apr 1, 2007
    Same to you sir, thanks. Watched any good fights lately?

    Even watching Olivares destroy some of the teak tough, upset capable Japanese journeymen of his era is jaw dropping stuff. Even his second tier wins like Art Hafey are incredible. Art Hafey is a far better and more accomplished fighter than the likes of Arturo Gatti, yet no one knows a singular thing about the guy.
     
    JC40 likes this.
  6. JC40

    JC40 Boxing fan since 1972 banned Full Member

    1,098
    1,866
    Jul 12, 2008

    Geezuz Russell Canadian Art Hafey, "the Toy Tiger " :) Wasnt Art's brother a fighter as well ?

    You're taking me back to the days of reading Ring & Boxing Illustrated magazines in the 70s. This is before KO, World Boxing etc arrived on the scene.

    The days before all these bloody divisions and when it was only the WBC and WBA who existed n they had FAR less pull than nowadays.

    Contenders actually fought each other to decide who would get a title shot unlike nowadays where they just sit on their ranking n wait their turn.

    As far as fights go my best mate n I watched Gamboa vs Crawford a couple of days ago. It was a pretty good fight actually.

    Cheers Mate
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2018
  7. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,443
    12,845
    Apr 1, 2007
    Funny you mention Gamboa's ill timed jump up in weight, much like I was talking about Olivare's suicide mission against Arguello. Gamboa must have gotten a nice paycheck for the fight but it definitely didn't help him with his career, momentum wise. To say he's stagnated in recent years, before finally going completely off the rails recently, well, it's an understatement.
     
    JC40 likes this.
  8. JC40

    JC40 Boxing fan since 1972 banned Full Member

    1,098
    1,866
    Jul 12, 2008
    This content is protected


    Olivares boxed superbly but Arguello was an absolute monster at featherweight. Similar to Hearns at 147 in that regard. Alexis had so much height, reach n power at the weight.
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  9. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,443
    12,845
    Apr 1, 2007
    Look at how Duran managed against his own Arguello in Hearns.... Just because you lose a fight doesn't necessarily mean you're an inferior fighter, especially when styles and age/mileage are taken into account.
     
  10. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,832
    14,580
    Jun 9, 2007
  11. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,513
    Jul 28, 2004
    Hi Russell,...another great thread from you sir, thank you! I was a big fan of the bantamweight division back in the 60's when I was a mere sprout:D...from the great Eder Jofre, his two losses to the Japanese Buzzsaw Fighting Harada, his conqueror Lionel Rose, and when Rose just did survive being decked by the excellent Jesus Chucho Castillo...I started reading about this Mexican ko sensation named Ruben Olivares....and though Rose was the champion, my appetite for boxing action what whetted by the prospect of an Olivares-Castillo showdown...but first things first, y'know? The title had to be won first from Rose, and from what I was reading, I had no doubt that he would do just that. Olivares was spectacular back in the late 60's...and the way he savaged Lionel Rose was spectacular. The biggest regret I have is that no one captured his defense vs Alan Rudkin on film....something I find utterly
    This content is protected
    ...like having no Greb films,...being unable to see Jerry Quarry's finest performance vs Buster Mathis, etc.,...
    As for the thread question, no, I don't think that he was as great as Monzon, who was unconquered and unhumbled till the end, but Ruben was indeed the more colorful, exciting, and entertaining fighter IMO...but he began descending from that late 60's, early 70's peak, and his weaknesses became more apparent...I don't think that he was a very dedicated, disciplined fighter..and his chin wasn't the greatest. He got humbled many times...by Herrera, Arguello, Kotey, Lopez, Hafey (though he came back to win the rematch)...i.e., he had a very short peak....his greatest ko win, after the Rudkin bout, was probably vs Pimentel imo,...and like you, I'm very impressed by that latter day ko of Ramirez...that was very impressive IMO.
     
    Eddie Ezzard, juppity, jowcol and 4 others like this.
  12. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,513
    Jul 28, 2004
    Excellent post Russell...
     
    Russell likes this.
  13. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,111
    12,125
    Mar 2, 2006

    Ruben Olivares vs. Alexis Arguello through 12 completed rounds, California scoring of one point for a winning round and none for an even round.

    Round 1: Even
    Round 2: Arguello
    Round 3: Olivares
    Round 4: Olivares
    Round 5: Arguello
    Round 6: Even
    Round 7: Olivares
    Round 8: Olivares
    Round 9: Olivares
    Round 10: Olivares
    Round 11: Olivares
    Round 12: Olivares
    Round 13: KO for Arguello

    Total: 8-2 Olivares through 12 completed rounds. Remember, Olivares was all of 5'5" and Arguello was 5'10" and there were at least two rounds there where I would actually say that Olivares was kicking the crap out of AA. I've always said Olivares was a true great at bantam but was underrated at 126. Of course, as Russell mentioned, it was the cantinas and the skirts that was Olivares' downfall.
     
  14. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,443
    12,845
    Apr 1, 2007
    Great stuff. Thanks RC! How ya' been lately!
     
  15. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,111
    12,125
    Mar 2, 2006
    Sorry, I should have mentioned that that scorecard was my opinion only.
     
    JC40 likes this.