Mike Spinks versus Gene Tunney at HEAVYWEIGHT

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Feb 11, 2018.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,363
    53,922
    Feb 11, 2005
    The oft belittled heavyweight Mike Spinks versus the beatified heavyweight Gene Tunney.

    Let's put them in a ring for FIFTEEN rounds. Who walks out the winner?

    And based on what? Try to be concrete and specific about your reasoning.
     
  2. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,765
    Jul 1, 2015
    You might as well just skip right to the part where you say the only good heavyweight that Tunney beat was Dempsey and that he almost got knocked out in the second fight and about how he wouldn't be able to take punches from the version of Holmes that Spinks fought, etc.
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,363
    53,922
    Feb 11, 2005
    One could argue quite successfully that the only good heavy Spinks beat was Holmes, so your easy way out has been boarded and nailed shut.
     
  4. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,765
    Jul 1, 2015
    Easy way out? We all know this is just going to turn into you disparaging Dempsey and going on and on about how he was a serial ******, pimp, etc. all unsubstantiated and completely false claims I might add.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  5. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    31,597
    38,891
    Jul 24, 2004
    Spinks defeated Murray Sutherland, Yaqui Lopez, Marvin Johnson, Eddie Mustapha Muhammed,
    Dwight Qawi, Larry Holmes, and Gerry Cooney. The only "names" on Tunney's record, besides Dempsey,
    are Harry Greb (who beat him up badly before losing an eye!), Carpentier, and Tommy Gibbons. And oh, BTW,
    not one black boxer on his record.

    Spinks plays with Tunney and KO's him middle rounds. Yes, I said it: PLAYS WITH HIM.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,009
    28,038
    Feb 15, 2006
    OK, they both built their resumes against a past prime all time great, and had a thin heavyweight resume besides.
    I still see everything favoring Tunney.

    Tunney fought the past time great who had the less excuses, and was much more dominant.

    Tunney left the sport because there was no obvious challenger, and Spinks left the sport because there were too many worthy challengers.

    Tunney could have been around for a while, and Spinks could not, even if Tyson hadn't happened.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,363
    53,922
    Feb 11, 2005
    OK, this is just laughable. Dempsey had plenty of excuses, the major one being he had sat on his rump for three years and entered the fight with no warm up. Meanwhile, Holmes had beaten an undefeated Williams, an undefeated Bey and a once defeated power punching Smith in the previous TWELVE MONTHS. That's the guy Spinks faced.

    And Tunney's "could have been around for a while" doesn't hold much water. He didn't have a track record in the division. He also "could have been dumped on his ass" the next fight or the first time a younger buck wanted to go more than 10 rounds.
     
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,644
    Mar 17, 2010
    I used to stare at Jack Dempsey’s pictures in the ring magazines. The reds and the blues convinced me that he was Superman. I used to look in the mirror and try to copy his pose. I believed he could punch through bone, and dodge a bullet. Then, I realized it was all a lie. He couldn’t shoot lasers from his eyes, or spin the world on his finger. His pose wasn’t even an actual boxing stance. My hero, Jack, was a lie. Why Jack, why!?!?? The illustrations!! They were so colorful!! You were supposed to save the world!! You were supposed to save ME!
     
    RockyJim and Mr.DagoWop like this.
  9. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    31,597
    38,891
    Jul 24, 2004
    LOL you are beyond saving. Neither Dempsey nor Superman can help you!
     
    JC40 likes this.
  10. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,644
    Mar 17, 2010
    How dare you.

    Any day now Jack will bob and weave from the heavens to swoop me up from this dump. You just have to stare at the ring magazine covers long enough and believe.
     
  11. Knights107

    Knights107 Member Full Member

    450
    211
    Aug 13, 2015
  12. JC40

    JC40 Boxing fan since 1972 banned Full Member

    1,098
    1,874
    Jul 12, 2008
    Howdy Seamus, my money is on Spinks. He has a good height advantage over Tunney , I also believe Spinks would have longer arms despite both having claimed 76 inch reaches. Tunney must have had a good set of wide shoulders on him.

    I believe Spinks has advantages over the " Fighting Marine " in experience, versatility and punching power and I would back Spinks to win the battle of the jabs with relative ease. Michael had an exceptional jab.

    Tunney looks pretty good on film but when you actually examine his record he didnt fight many good, prime fighters let alone great ones.

    He usually seemed to have an advantage in his fights too, either size or age.

    I have never been that convinced of the merits of heavyweights pre Joe Louis to be completely honest. Boxing was a relatively new sport as far as gloved fighting and the Marquis of Queensbury rules go in the post WW1 period.

    As a final comment I reckon Spinks would have much more experience at fighting a guy like Tunney than Tunney would at fighting a guy like Spinks.

    Cheers All.
     
    reznick likes this.
  13. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,893
    10,092
    Jul 15, 2008
    I think it is a very interesting fight. Spinks has an inch or so in height. Tunney an inch in reach. Over fifteen maybe Tunney edges him but I can see many close bouts in a Charles / Walcott manner.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  14. Grapefruit

    Grapefruit Active Member Full Member

    1,215
    944
    Dec 19, 2017
    I think they were both equally skilled, but I favor spinks because he was the bigger, faster more awkward of the two.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  15. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,475
    Jan 6, 2007
    15 rounds.Tunney 195 lbs, Spinks 208 lbs. Tunney starts early and has a points lead after 10 rounds. The Spinks Jinx begins to find Tunney more and more, and a Spinks' left upper cut/right hand, TKO's Tunney, as Tunney attempts to rise at a count of "eleven", in the 13th round.

    Tunney vs Tommy Gibbons: Tunney 181 lbs, Gibbons 179
    This content is protected


    Tunney vs Carpentier: Tunney 173.5 lbs, Carpentier 173 lbs
    This content is protected


    Tunney vs Tom Heeney: Tunney 195 lbs, Heeney 203 lbs
    This content is protected


    Spinks vs Tunney, Spinks 208 lbs, Cooney 238 lbs
    This content is protected