PAC all time top 10...If he beat Hatton

ill call him p4p when he gets extremely muscular and eventually goes to heavyweight, beating diaz,hatton,floyd,pavlik,calzaghe,and haye on the way, and ending his journey with a UD over peter and a straight left KO over Wlad. LOL jp but itll really be something if he can beat hatton.

 

seems you keep on having orgasms about pacs two losses that happened when the dinosaurs roamed the world..... let me give you another booster seems your IQ is failing again ... :good because for sure, as a pacteron like you, you didnt follow pacs career closely not till today when pac is currently making you a pacteron.... :yep

let me give you an insight about those losses.

"Manny Pacquiao, sometimes simply known as Pacman, began his career in 1995, at age 16. He won his first couple of fights, before bumping into

This content is protected

, who scored a

This content is protected

over Pacquiao, but the replay clearly showed that Torrecampo hit Manny below the belt."
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Human:6129


"Sometimes, though, he lacked focus or got careless. In his first five years, he lost twice. In his 12th fight, he was trailing fellow Filipino Rustico Torrecampo in Round 3 when Torrecampo knocked Pacquiao down and out -- in a collision that seemed to combine a low blow and a head butt "
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=3281702
:nono :nono :tong :tong :hey :hey

and the singruat fight.. damn pac lost already that fight even before the bell rang. :huh

"Pacquiao fails to make weight and lost his

This content is protected

Flyweight title at the weigh-in"
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:13465

:nono :nono :tong :tong :hey :hey

pretty sure that sums it up. well a loss is a loss. nothing we can do about it. but it is your only mini solace just to battle your depression and get back at pac and us i dont blame you for that

i

 

lol! youre a hater. give the man his due. he beat a prime barrera in 2003, morales was still a force to reckon with in their second meeting, and he beat jmm twice.

 

you are a clown.. :good :good

pac lost to jmm twice :yikes :yikes maybe you watched mexican cable operated by jmms friends during those fights :!:

old morales.. last time i check em was 20 something. :yep :yep

too many pacterons. :bart

 

guzrun?? :!:
soto? whats with soto?? you are trying to feed pac an old steak that is overhyped.. :!:
now suddenly a battle worn em and mab.. last time i checked pac is also battle worn when he fought those guys :!:

NOW this makes it interesting. HATTON is suddenly "like **** lately and was overrated to begin with" atsch too early for your excuse for hatton my amigo. last time i checked this forum, pac will not go past 4 rounds against hatton. asked KG :yep :yep now when we discuss pacs all time greatness status suddenly hatton is overrated and mab and em was battleworn......

what a reversal of fortune huh :!: :!: :rofl :rofl

 

Easily top 20 . . . top 10? Very debatable.

 

Yeah that would be one pretty god dam impressive resume. I'd definitely have to think long and hard about where to put him....I'd say that I'd probably put him in the top 30-20. But I'd have to wait and see how I felt about how he won and other stuff like that.

 

Why do people scrutinize a professional boxers career? Jesus Christ you can do that to every boxer. Do you want to give Pacquiao some credit for choosing the path of MOST resistance, back to back to back to back HARD ASS fights, WITHOUT BREAK. The man is fearless, If you want to nitpick a fighters career, please do it to a heartless ***** that runs from everyone. But NOT Pacquiao atsch. I'm not even a BIG fan of Pacquiao, but people who wanna do this to Pacquiao = atsch

 

A win over Hatton would be very impressive. Irrigardless of the way he looked at two points in an otherwise dominant preformance Hatton is still a force. And if you want to make the arguement that Hatton's brawling style and battles with the scale has made him shop worn and not make the same or similar arguements with respect to manny then your a hipocrate. Everyone knows that he is not prime or is nearing th end as well (maybe not to the same extend) but add in the natural weight advantages for Hatton and a Win over Hatton would be extremely impressive.

Also: jecxbox, ^, couldn't agree more:good Pick on bitches not a balls out warrior.

 

Top 40-45. I dont think a loss to Hatton would affect this but a win would move him up slightly (ie top 35-40).

 

No. Top 30 probably.

 

i see some still try to discredit Pac's accomplishments. tsk tsk! Just face it, He has come a long way being what you call "a 1-dimensional fighter", hard to believe i would agree. But it happened!!!

 

i am a pac fan but i think top ten is too much...and possibly a joke assuming your only basis is hatton.

Theres a lot of great fighters all time and i hope lets not also forget what they accomplished

 

Hatton is not much of a prize
and who wants to see hook, hold.....hook, hold......hook, hold......over and over again until real boxing fans want to stab their eyes out?
I don't, Hatton should join MMA or WWE which suits his unskilled fighting(wrestling) style well