"Philip sent a message to the Spartans saying “If I invade Lakonia you will be destroyed, never to rise again.” The Spartans replied with one word, “If.” Philip eventually decided to bypass Sparta ..." https://www.warhistoryonline.com/in...ses-boldest-wittiest-lines-ever-recorded.html
Not from me. I saw him hit Golovkin with as big a shot as he is likely to throw i that last fight and im not even sure Golovkin blinked. If he is able to throw any harder than that it is the juice. Ive always said i cant see how Canelo can improve much more for the rematch but i forgot the option to just cheat more.
None, no credit whatsoever if he stopped or decisioned GGG, not now. Canelo tested positive for a banned substance, everything he does from now on should be question marked. Another question, If Golovkin knocks the absolute snot out of Canelo, assuming Canelo is being tested regularly and the heat that's on him now can we look back at his entire career and question it?
So you would agree the same can be said for Tyson a Hughie fury who both tested positive for steroids and blamed it on contaminated meat? If Fury beats AJ/Wilder he gets no credit? do you also question his win over Wlad?
Thing is though, you're living in fantasyland when asking that question anyways. There's a higher chance of me going to the moon than Canelo knocking GGG out. GGG has the best chin in boxing currently, he's never been down in over 300 amateur and professional fights. Isn't going to change now.
The chances of the KO happening don't stop you answering the question which makes that irrelevant. Strong username tho.
Yes absolutely, any fighter that tests positive for a banned substance should be questioned throughout their careers. Whatever Fury does now should have a question mark over it in my opinion. I have to question them because personally I am not buying all these contaminated meat excuses.