Quit jivin` Wilder and sign to fight AJ now!!

Yes im guna say that, the corruption is right there, we can all see it happening infront of our very eyes.

When or if Joshua gets caught with Peds in him i will come down on him like a ton of bricks, at the moment all i know he is beig tested hundreds of times a year and has so far run clean, UKAD, VADA, all of that. Fury has lost all his belts, not fought since, been banned and hasnt come back yet. He has been punished.

 

And what about Jamie McDonnell vs Liborio Solis? Ricky Burns vs Raymundo Beltran?

 

Regardless of purse sizes etc... the fight has to happen in the uk.

 

And yet Higgins still thinks he pulled a trick over Hearns as noted in the article I posted. Higgins never complained about Hearn's unfair practices and Higgins let's not forget went bat**** over such shenanigans at the Fury press conference. If he felt he was being squeezed in anyway we would of seen Higgins kick off about it no doubt. Wlad also never said anything to suggest there were any strong arm tactics to force an advantage.

Yes Parker's purse was fair, but lets be real here, no way he makes that much money without Joshua, while Joshua's guarantee for the Parker fight was only 3 mill more than the Takam fight. Joshua was the one who had to overpay an opponent to ensure the fight happened not Parker.

And yes of course Wilder and Haymon should ensure there is no funny business, that's what any good manager should do, due diligence is required in any field of work. But if Wilder does that, he's just ensuring he's getting a fair shake, when Joshua does the same, he's leveraging every advantage he can get, the bias from you is obvious in this and other posts you've made.

Remember the scorecards for Wilder/Ortiz, Wilder was winning on all 3 judges scorecards before the stoppage when everyone the press and commentary team had Ortiz ahead. Then of course there was the odd doctors check up just when Wilder needed more time to recover.

 

Errr. Dammit, good examples. Only defence is they were close fights with home town decisions. But yes the wrong men won those fights. Im not saying it doesnt happen, it happens a bit everywhere.

 

Likewise

 

I think the Takam stoppage is universally derided as a poor stoppage. No way that should of ever been stopped, but lets not forget it didn't change much other than it perhaps making it a stoppage instead of a wide UD, Joshua was dominating the fight and who knows had the ref let the fight go on it may have still ended a stoppage. The Froch/Groves stoppage was worse, at least that fight was competitive.

As for the ref in the Parker fight, continental European refs should just come with a label saying they are ****, it's so common it's practically a cliche. An incompetent ref isn't the same as a corrupt one.

 

I agree- Higgins could have done a better job for his fighter.
Wlad appreciates cheating is part of the game, as highlighted by Fury.
Joshua pulls in the casual fans but a fight needs a credible opponent.
No bias- my view is clear. Joshua is a hyped up fighter who was gifted much of his success. His selling point is his humility and professionalism yet he is a narcissistic cheater. At least Wilder is honest.
Don't disagree with you that Haymon + his fighters cheat too...

 

This is how boxing is, the "house" fighter can get a 3 round headstart plus advantageous reffing etc etc this has been going on in all countries for decades particularly noticeable in germany and vegas (imo) where it has been taken to a whole new level in recent years, vegas is now a cesspit of corruption and bias that may never be fixed. Ward in nearby oakland is legendary as a house fighter, it would literally be impossible to win a decision v him under any circumstances.

The UK is no different but wilder has no chance of out pointing joshua anyway, home or away (imo), he only wins by KO, so its not bad for him at all