Do you support the idea of the unbeatable h2h fighters?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Ukrainian, Jul 31, 2018.


  1. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie

    10,647
    9,477
    Jan 10, 2007
    I don't support it at all. Even if we take fighters only at their peak.

    I believe that if we match, say, top-20 HWs of all time against each other at their peak, the best of the best, no one would have less than 3 losses.

    There are few reasons for that

    1) Styles. If we take Ali who is considered by many as the best h2h HW of all time, he had his stylistic nightmare Ken Norton which he couldn't beat convincingly at least once in 3 fights. Every fighter has wrong styles to deal with.

    2) Neither fighter in history isn't 'head and shoulders' above all the others. Every fighter has his flaws which would definitely be exposed if he's matched against the best in history, even if he's one of them.

    3) Fighters DO make mistakes even at their peak. Even the best fighter at his peak can make wrong decisions in the fight, or just get careless, and pay for it.

    Therefore I have no doubts that any given ATG fighter would've had his fair share of losses if he was matched in the line against the best in history, no matter how 'peak', how strong, how talented he is.
     
    Jel, BCS8, BitPlayerVesti and 5 others like this.
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,657
    Jun 2, 2006
    Nobody is unbeatable.
     
  3. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,581
    11,095
    Oct 28, 2017
    I don't buy it either, all the greats had poor performances, and lesser fighters can overperform, especially if they have a gameplan that can work to their opponents weaknesses.
     
    mrkoolkevin and Big Ukrainian like this.
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,364
    Jun 29, 2007
    Not really, but I do think its possible for a great fighter to win 60 or more fights in a row, or defend his belt 20 times or more. In the end father time is undefeated.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    Nobody is unbeatable.

    I believe in one off fantasy fights you can favour one many over any other, but in this instance you have to consider synergy.

    I favour Jones Jr over every LHW who came before and after but I wouldn't favour him to emerge from a gauntlet of greats unbeaten.
     
  6. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    32,205
    23,560
    Sep 29, 2008
    Not at all. If this were true, upsets would never happen.
     
  7. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    I agree
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  8. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    Lol sonny liston is the h2h superman but curiously he never showed it in the real world. Pathetic
     
    red cobra likes this.
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,607
    Jan 30, 2014
    The problem is that some fans seem to view these guys as super heroes instead of as athletes competing in a high-risk sport against other top athletes, subject to injuries and ailments, distractions, bad reffing and judging, and, especially, plain bad luck, etc.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2018
  10. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,960
    10,428
    Jun 9, 2010
    In debate on speculative H2H scenarios, we reason for the likelihood of the outcome, applied under optimum conditions and to what are sometimes very fine lines.

    However, in practice, a 19-fight series against competitors, who are hard to separate in terms of their respective abilities, is almost certainly going to lead to mixed results. This too is speculation, of course, and follows the same type of reasoning of likelihood.
     
    Jel and mrkoolkevin like this.
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,011
    28,042
    Feb 15, 2006
    No.

    If you give me your top 20 heavyweights of all time, then your number 20 would probably have a chance against your number 1, unless your number 1 had a big stylistic advantage (say it was Joe Louis vs Floyd Patterson).
     
  12. thesnowman22

    thesnowman22 Member Full Member

    432
    70
    Dec 29, 2013
    When we discuss "who would win", we are really discussing who wins the majority of the time. So even if you "win" the h2h match up, it really just means youd win >50%.

    "Noone could beat Tyson in his prime" for example.
    Well of course someone COULD. But who would beat him more than 50%? Everyone CAN be beat.
     
  13. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    Lol foreman,holyfield,Ali,Lewis ?
     
  14. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,589
    40,192
    Aug 28, 2012
    Everyone is beatable.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,376
    53,937
    Feb 11, 2005