This is How to FIX the Judging

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Peterp, Sep 16, 2018.


  1. ryuken87

    ryuken87 Active Member Full Member

    1,468
    877
    Mar 8, 2014
    I don't think so. The promoters of the A side will get to decide the commentators who would use their position to sway the audience. It would just be a popularity contest.
     
  2. JacK Rauber

    JacK Rauber Unbourboned by what has been Full Member

    12,499
    15,542
    Oct 20, 2013
    Hard to believe, I know. These people sitting in judgment are paupers.
     
  3. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,915
    Apr 14, 2009
    The answer is easy Hire three HONEST unbiased judges!!
    But first kick out the State Commissions which is where the corruption starts ,form an International Commission & put Teddy Atlas at the head. NO MORE CORRUPTION !!!!
     
  4. Salty Dog

    Salty Dog globalize the Buc-ees revolution Full Member

    11,457
    6,919
    Sep 5, 2008
    You think there are politics in the sport now? It would be exponentially worse with ongoing campaigns directed at voters and people voting that have little to no idea what they are watching, etc. There's more than enough of that irl. No thanks.
     
  5. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,635
    18,358
    Oct 7, 2006
    Or people can learn how to properly score a pro fight using the system already in place.

    And no, landing 2.5 jabs more per round doesn't win you fights when your opponent is kocking your head around and rearranging your internal organs.
     
    Welterschmelter likes this.
  6. mb1233

    mb1233 Active Member Full Member

    913
    569
    Aug 18, 2017
    Best way to fix the very inconsistent judging in boxing is to destroy the money. Watch MMA.
     
  7. Smudge_

    Smudge_ Teak tough Full Member

    2,247
    3,254
    Jan 23, 2018

    Surely that can't be a serious suggestion. Fights would be getting decided on popularity. Wives and girlfriends attending the shows with their men voting for who they think is the better looking one FFS. You must be having a laugh!
     
  8. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,152
    Dec 23, 2013
    Wanna get rid of judging? Go back to 15 rounds. Stoppages will increase. Also switch the 3 judges to a computerized system where they put in a score for the round its registered and the judge cant go back to alter it or is able to see his scores as the fight progresses.
     
  9. GGGunbeatable

    GGGunbeatable Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,718
    9,359
    Feb 14, 2014
    Slow motion of every exchange need to be analyzed by a group of judges, sitting in another room. May take a bit longer to get the result, but at least there can't be robberies. Fights must be uploaded on Youtube weeks afterwards, so the public can be sure there was no corruption.
     
  10. Alphafighter

    Alphafighter Active Member banned Full Member

    720
    588
    Dec 4, 2017
    I am pretty sure the vast majority of the audience will be impartial and will vote based on what they saw in the fight
     
  11. TheChinaChin

    TheChinaChin New Member Full Member

    53
    50
    Aug 29, 2017
    Here's my suggestion, for what it's worth.

    In my opinion for most fights the current 3 judge system is fine. Imagine paying 50 judges, or however many you need, to score what turns out to be a first round knockout.

    Have the fight scored normally. However if at least two of the three judges return score cards which are closer than 117-111, this will trigger a decision referral and no official result will be announced that night.

    Firstly, wipe out all three of the live judges cards. Instead the decision will be made by 5 new judges who have yet to watch the fight and have had no contact with anyone to give any hint to how the fight played out. When they sit down to score the fight all they know for sure is that at least two live judges had it fairly close.

    These 5 then have Sunday morning to watch the fight in silence (no commentary or crowd noises etc.) as many times as necessary whilst having full access to watching a full round in slow motion as well as replays.

    The official result would then be announced at a public press conference on Sunday evening.
     
  12. Blackclouds

    Blackclouds Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,545
    1,508
    Nov 9, 2013
    Lol who's going to pay for all these judges? Maybe if boxing had NFL money but this is ridiculous.
     
  13. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,843
    15,620
    Nov 9, 2015
    Where do all these judges magically appear from? For every major pro fight on every card in every affiliated country in the world?
     
    Badbot likes this.
  14. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,843
    15,620
    Nov 9, 2015
    I'll throw my idea into the ring. Three judges as we have now, scoring as they do. But instead of comparing their overall score for the fight, they are compared round-by-round. So for example, if two judges score a round 10/9 for Fighter A, but the other scores it 9/10 or 8/10 for Fighter B, then Fighter A wins the round 10/9 on a simple majority. And the same for the other 11 rounds.

    My thinking is maybe sometimes judges see how they have scored the first eight rounds or so and can be tempted to even things up (for whatever reason). My suggestion would eliminate a judge being able to influence the result with a rank bad card made up of 4-5 poorly-scored rounds.

    If this system throws up a draw, you then use the current system as a tie-breaker and judge the fight overall.

    I scored the first GGG vs Canelo fight using this system last week and it came up with 115-113 for GGG.

    https://puu.sh/Bwc8m/63a6531ad9.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2018
  15. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things.

    51,097
    40,921
    Apr 17, 2011
    No bias there....
     
    DoubleJab666 likes this.